Target covertly predicts teen girl pregnancy
US-based supermarket chain Target was discovered to be quietly using a 'pregnancy prediction algorithm' to predict the pregancies of its customers, prompting a backlash about privacy abuse, poor transparency and ethics. What happened New York Times ' Charles Duhigg reported that a father had discovered that his teenage daughter was pregnant when he complained to a Target store in Minneapolis that she had received pregnancy-related coupons. It transpired Target had been calculat ing the likelihood that its customers were pregnant, and estimated due dates, by combining data from individual purchases across approximately 25 product categories, such as prenatal vitamins and lotions , with sociodemographic characteristics from public records databases. Each shopper was then assigned a 'pregnancy prediction' score that would enable the retailer to send coupons and other marketing information. It also transpired that Target had been producing brochures that had some non-baby merchandise sprinkled around the baby goodies, so the newly pregnant women would not realise they had been targeted. Why it happened Target used predictive analytics to drive sales and market its products and services more efficiently by identifying major life changes like pregnancy early. The lack of clear disclosure about this profiling and ethical considerations led to backlash. Wh at it means The controversy resulted in a debate about the need for clear, visible communication and the informed consent of customers, including whether privacy and terms of service are sufficient to notify consumers of the use of data mining techniques. System 🤖 Target pregnancy prediction model Operator: Target Developer: Target; Andrew Pole Country: USA Sector: Retail Purpos e: Predict pregnancy Technology: Prediction algorithm Issue: Privacy; Transparency
- Date it happened
- 2012-02-01
- Organisation involved
- Target
- Product, system or model
- Pregnancy prediction algorithm
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.