UCLA facial recognition surveillance plan slammed as biased, intrusive
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) abandoned plans to install facial recognition after a backlash from students and rights groups concerned about its potential for discrimination, surveillance and impact on privacy. UCLA announced (pdf) in September 2018 that it was planning to introduce facial recognition in order to improve campus safety and centralise campus security camera systems and give university police access to footage during emergencies. The move resulted in a backlash from students and a campaign by digital rights advocacy group Fight for the Future, which used Amazon's facial recognition software Rekognition on UCLA sportspeople and faculty to demonstrate the technology's capacity for delivering false matches. Backing down from the plan, UCLA Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck said, 'the potential benefits are limited and are vastly outweighed by the concerns of the campus community.' UCLA would have been the first university in the US to adopt facial recognition. System 🤖 Unknown Documents 📃 UCLA Policy 133: Security Camera Systems DRAFT for Public Review (pdf) Operator: UCLA Developer: Country: USA Sector: Education Purpose: Strengthen security; Increase safety Technology: Facial recognition Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Bias/discrimination ; Privacy; Surveillance
- Date it happened
- 2020-02-01
- Organisation involved
- UCLA
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.