China Pharmaceutical University student behavioural monitoring
Photographs showing students at China Pharmaceutical University in Nanjing being monitored and analysed triggered concerns that Chinese AI company Megvii was jeopardising student privacy and freedom of movement. According to the South China Morning Press , the university was using the facial recognition and emotion recognition system at the university gate, entrances to the dormitory building, library, lab, and two classrooms so that managers can 'track their students.' 'Besides attendance, the system installed in the classroom can provide surveillance of the students' learning, such as whether they are listening to the lectures, how many times they raise their heads, and whether they are playing on their phones or falling asleep,' Xu Jianzhen, director of the university's library and information centre said. The furore prompted the Chinese government to say it would 'curb and regulate' the use of facial recognition technology and other technologies in schools. Megvii responded by saying the photo was a pilot and that it is providing greater campus safety while helping school administrators improve efficiency. It went on to say that it 'always insisted on technology for good, so that artificial intelligence can benefit everyone.' ➕ January 2021. M egvii w as discovered filing patents for systems capable of recognising Uyghurs. System 🤖 Megvii 🔗 Documents 📃 Megviii response Operator: China Pharmaceutical University Developer: Megvii Country: China Sector: Education Purpose: Assess student attentiveness, strengthen campus safety, improve attendance Technology: Facial recognition; Emotion recognition; Deep learning; Neural network; Machine learning Issue: Privacy; Surveillance
- Date it happened
- 2019-09-01
- Organisation involved
- China Pharmaceutical University
- Product, system or model
- Face++
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.