← the record
AIAAIC-0416

Lincolnshire police AI behaviour recognition pilot draws concerns

A plan by Lincolnshire police to trial a controversial facial recognition and behavioural analysis system drew concerns from rights and privacy advocates. Lincolnshire Police said it aimed to test an artificial intelligence system that could analyse CCTV footage to detect people's moods and facial expressions, search for individuals wearing specific items like hats or glasses, and identify people carrying bags or umbrellas. The aim of the system was to i dentify suspects in crowds, such as at football matches, catch serious offenders more quickly, and to e nhance existing facial recognition capabilities already used through the Police National Database. The force had received funding from the UK Home Office to pilot the technology in the town of Gainsborough. The proposed trial raised significant privacy and ethical concerns, with civil liberties groups such as Big Brother Watch arguing it would violate people's privacy rights, while others questioned the scientific validity of AI emotion detection technology. Some also expressed concerns about the expansion of the UK state's surveillance capabilities. The pilot was delayed due to the ethical concerns raised, with Lincolnshire Police saying it would conduct human rights and privacy assessments before potentially moving forward. System 🤖 Unknown Operator: Lincolnshire Police Developer: Country: UK Sector: Govt - police Purpose: Identify criminal suspects Technology: Emotion recognition Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Ethics/values; Human/civil rights; Privacy; Surveillance

Date it happened
2020-08-01
Organisation involved
Lincolnshire Police
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.