← the record
AIAAIC-0434

Buenos Aires government uses live facial recognition to identify child criminals

Buenos Aires authorities were accused by Human Rights Watch (HRW) of using live facial recognition to identify children accused of committing crimes, thereby violating a United Nations agreement that protects children’s privacy in legal proceedings. According to HRW, the details of 'at least 166' children accused of committing crimes were stored on Argentina's CONARC, the country's national database of inviduals with outstanding arrest warrants for serious crimes, between May 2017 and May 2020. HRW contended the City of Buenos Aires' live facial recognition system is likely to amplify the risks of wrong identification of children due to the known inaccuracies of such systems when used on children, and to potentially unjustly limit their job and educational opportunities. Argentina is thought to be the only country in the world to deploy live facial recognition against people under the age of 18. System 🤖 Sistema de Reconocimiento Facial de Prófugos Documents 📃 Buenos Aires government (2022). Reconocimiento facial: el gobierno de la Ciudad recusó al juez Roberto Gallardo Operator: Government of the City of Buenos Aires; Buenos Aires City Police; Argentine Ministry of Justice and Security ; ReNaPer Developer: Danaide/NtechLab Country: Argentina Sector: Govt - municipal; Govt - police; Govt - security Purpose: Identify criminals Technology: Facial recognition Issue: Accuracy/reliability, Bias/discrimination, Human/civil rights, Surveillance; Transparency

Date it happened
2020-10-01
Organisation involved
Government of the City of Buenos Aires; Buenos Aires City Police; Argentine Ministry of Justice and Security; ReNaPer
Product, system or model
Sistema de Reconocimiento Facial de Prófugos (SNRP)
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.