← the record
AIAAIC-0435

Ugandan police accused of using facial recognition to stifle Museveni term protests

Ugandan police were accused of using a facial recognition system supplied by Chinese company Huawei to track, arrest, and torture protesters against President Yoweri Museveni’s November 2020 decision to seek another term in office. Local politicians and rights advocates had flagged possible human rights and privacy violations when the system was acquired in 2019 as part of Huawei’s Safe City programme. Since 2020, civil society groups have criticised governance institutions in Uganda for failing to protect the fundamental rights of citizens from surveillance in public places. This comes amidst reports that Uganda is expanding its digital surveillance capabilities as part of a nationwide integrated surveillance system , including capabilities to check vehicle license plates and monitor social media. A Ugandan police spokesperson denied that the technology was used to monitor opposition figures but confirmed that a new surveillance system was in use. In transition or fragile democracies, this incident raises questions over how imported surveillance technologies are used to quash protests and suppress individual freedoms. Reports indicate other countries in Africa increasingly importing surveillance technologies, including Nigeria, Morocco, Zambia and Ghana. System 🤖 Huawei Operator: Governme nt of Uganda; Uganda Police Force Developer: Huawei Country: Uganda Sector: Govt - home/interior; police Purpose: Identify individuals Technology: Facial analysis; Safe city Issue: Dual/Multi-use; Governance; Human/civil rights; Privacy; Surveillance

Date it happened
2020-11-01
Organisation involved
Government of Uganda; Uganda Police Force
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.