Cleveland State University bedroom scans ruled 'unconstitutional'

An Ohio judge ruled that the scanning of students' rooms before and during remote exams constitured an invasion of privacy and violated the US Fourth Amendment’s protection against unlawful searches in American homes. Cleveland State University student Aaron Ogletree agreed to a room scan before a chemistry exam. With other people in his home, he took the test in his bedroom, where he had sensitive tax documents spread out on a surface. These documents were visible in the room scan recording and were shared with other students. The university had defended its room scans by saying that it had become common during the COVID-19 pandemic and more acceptable to society, that Ogletree had not been coerced into scanning his room, and that he could have removed any sensitive documents or have chosen to take the test in a different room. The ruling raised questions about the nature and legality of Honorlock and other online exam cheating detection systems , and was applauded by digital rights and privacy groups. Privacy non-profit Fight for the Future said the ruling was a 'major victory' and called on higher learning institutions 'to ban not only room scans, but invasive and discriminatory eproctoring software once and for all .' System 🤖 Honorlock 🔗 Operator: Cleveland State University (CSU) Developer: Honorlock; Respondus Country: USA Sector: Education Purpose: Detect and prevent cheating Technology: Facial detection; Gaze detection; Machine learning Issue: Accountability; Privacy Legal, regulatory 👩🏼‍⚖️ Aaron Ogletree v. Cleveland State University, et al

Date it happened

2022-12-01

Organisation involved

Cleveland State University

Product, system or model

Honorlock; Respondus

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.