GitHub Copilot accused of copying code from developers
D evelopers sued GitHub, Microsoft and OpenAI for allegedly copying their code to train the AI-powered coding assistant GitHub Copilot without proper attribution, permission or compensation, reinforcing general concerns about possible copyright abuse by AI companies. What happened The lawsuit claims that GitHub Copilot was trained on publicly available code and subsequently suggested code snippets that were directly copied from the plaintiffs' repositories. The developers allege that this practice violates copyright laws and software licensing requirements, as Copilot presents others' code as its own without appropriate credit. Why it happened C entral to the controversy is GitHub Copilot's training, which used a huge amount of publicly available code to generate suggestions for developers. The plaintiffs argue that this training method results in Copilot reproducing verbatim snippets of their copyrighted code. They also contend that GitHub's filtering system, designed to detect and suppress such matches, is ineffective and allows for the reproduction of copyrighted material. What it means Lawyers are divided on whether GitHub and OpenAI's use of public repositories can be considered fair use given Copilot draws extensively on code available under many different types of public license, only some of which require attribution for derivative works.
- Date it happened
- 2022-01-01
- Organisation involved
- GitHub
- Product, system or model
- GitHub Copilot
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.