Tesla on Autopilot kills Kanagawa pedestrian

Yoshihiro Umeda, a 44-year-old husband and father, was killed when a Tesla Model X with Autopilot turned on crashed into a group of people gathered at the site of an earlier motorcycle accident outside Tokyo, highlighting the dangers of inadequate driver monitoring and the "automation bias" created by semi-autonomous systems. A car in front of the Tesla changed lanes to avoid the group of bikers, but the Tesla driver was reputedly dozing and Autopilot failed to change lanes and accelerated until it hit the group . Umeda's relatives filed a lawsuit against Tesla in California's Northern District Court claiming that the company's Autopilot system is 'defective and incapable of handling common driving scenarios' and that its system for detecting drivers who aren't paying attention is 'fatally defective'. The judge sided with Tesla’s motion to dismiss, suggesting Japan is the most appropriate venue for the case based on ' forum non conveniens .' Forum non conveniens says that a U.S. court can dismiss a case when another court may be better suited to hear it. The case has yet to to filed in Japan. The Tesla driver was officially sentenced to three years in prison and up to five years of suspension. System 🤖 Tesla Autopilot, Full-self Driving Developer: Tesla Country: Japan Sector: Automotive Purpose: Automate steering, acceleration, braking Technology: Driver assistance system Issue: Accountability; Accuracy/reliability; Automation bias ; Safety Timeline ⏰ April 29, 2018. The fatal crash occurs on the Tomei Expressway in Kanagawa, Japan. April 2020. The family of Yoshihiro Umeda files a wrongful death lawsuit against Tesla in a San Jose, California federal court. June 2020. Public reports emerge detailing the "patent defect" allegations, framing it as the first Autopilot-related pedestrian death. 2021–2024. Increased regulatory scrutiny from the NHTSA and Japanese authorities regarding Tesla’s driver monitoring and stationary object detection. Legal, regulatory 👩🏼‍⚖️ Umeda v Tesla George Washington University. ETI AI Litigation Database: case details

Date it happened

2018-04-01

Product, system or model

Tesla Autopilot

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.