Aadhaar facial recognition test raises marginalisation concerns
An Indian government test of facial recognition integrated within the country's Aadhaar biometric ID system raised concerns that millions of vulnerable people without mobile phones or internet access would lose out on receiving their COVID-19 vaccinations. A facial recognition system based on India's Aadhaar ID is being tested in the eastern state of Jharkhand as a 'touchless' vaccination process and hence better way of avoiding infection. Should the pilot prove successful, t he system may replace fingerprint or iris scans at COVID-19 vaccination centres across the country , according to Reuters. RS Sharma, head of India's National Health Authority, was quoted as saying the system would not be mandatory, but new guidelines indicate that Aadhaar is already the 'preferred' mode of identity verification and for vaccination certificates. Anushka Jain, associate counsel at the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), told Reuters that using facial recognition at vaccine centres risks further marginalising vulnerable people who may be misidentified and refused the vaccine, and raises fears the controversial technology could become the norm at all centres. The IFF filed Right to Information requests demanding to know the specific purposes for which facial recognition technology will be used, the legislation which authorises them to do so, and the total expenditure incurred to procure such technology. The IFF also sought to know the list of persons authorised to access the technology, the software and hardware being used, and details of the database. System 🤖 AadhaarFaceRD Operator: Aadhaar Developer: Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI); National Health Authority (NHA) Country: India Sector: Govt - health Purpose: Verify identity Technology: Facial recognition Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Fairness
- Date it happened
- 2021-04-01
- Organisation involved
- Aadhaar
- Product, system or model
- AadhaarFaceRD
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.