← the record
AIAAIC-0614

YouTube ads hate speech blocklist is 'inconsistent' and barely applied

An investigation revealed that Google’s automated "blocklist" for YouTube ad placements was easily bypassed by hate groups while simultaneously penalising social justice content, causing financial harm to marginalised creators and brand safety risks for advertisers. According to The Markup , Google’s YouTube blocklist of hate terms is inconsistent and highly permeable, allowing advertisers to target people in terms such as 'white lives matter' and 'white power' but blocking them from running ads against terms such as 'Black Lives Matter. It also found that less than a third of the 86 hate-related terms tested were blocked . Google later said it had blocked additional terms associated with hate speech from being used as ad keywords on YouTube videos. The company said it does not publicly state how it develops its enforcement tools so that bad actors are less likely to game its system. The episode raised questions about Google's commitment to user safety, and the extent to which it permitted the monetisation of hate content to boost its own profits. System 🤖 Canvas LMS Operator: Alphabet/Google/YouTube Developer: Alphabet/Google/YouTube Country: USA Sector: Technology Purpose: Identify and block offensive ads Technology: Advertising management system Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Bias/discrimination; Safety; Transparency Investigations, audits, assessments 👁️ The Markup . Google Has a Secret Blocklist that Hides YouTube Hate Videos from Advertisers—But It’s Full of Holes The Markup . How We Discovered Google’s Hate Blocklist for Ad Placements on YouTube The Markup. Story data

Date it happened
2021-04-01
Organisation involved
YouTube
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.