← the record
AIAAIC-0615

Study: Facebook allows finance companies to target users by age

F our US credit card and financial loan companies excluded certain age groups from their advertising campaigns on Facebook, potentially violating US law. A ccording to The Markup , t he exclusions by Aspiration, Chime, Hometap, and Varo, violate Facebook's anti-discrimination policies and in some cases potentially transgress US federal or state civil rights laws. The findings appeared to contradict a claim by Facebook vice president Monica Bickert in an appear ance before a Senate Judiciary hearing on social media in April 2021 that Facebook did not al low the use of sensitive targeting criteria when placing financial services and housing ads . US senator Mazie Hirono used The Markup 's article to accuse Bickert of making a claim that 'appears to be false'. The incident raised questions about how consistently implementation of Facebook's anti-discrimination policy was implemented and enforced, allowing some companies to target ads based on age, resulting in potential discrimination and the violation of civil rights law. System 🤖 Facebook Ads Manager Operator: Meta/Faceboo k Developer: Meta/Facebook Country: USA Sector: Technology Purpose: Target audiences Technology: Advertising management system Issue: Bias/discrimination Resource s 📃 US Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Algorithms and Amplification: How Social Media Platforms’ Design Choices Shape Our Discourse and Our Minds Investigations, assessment, audits 👁️ The Markup . Credit Card Ads Were Targeted by Age, Violating Facebook’s Anti-Discrimination Policy

Date it happened
2021-04-01
Organisation involved
Facebook
Product, system or model
Facebook Ads Manager
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.