← the record
AIAAIC-0627

Appen blasted for recruitment skin colour assessments

A digital media strategist applying for a job at Australian AI gig working company Appen revealed the company is asking potential employees to describe their skin tone during its job application process. In the application form, the company offered job-seekers the option to disclose their gender identify, ethnicity, complexion and whether they are disabled. A pplying for a role in the US, Charné Graham opted to select her complexion, from light to brown to black, having ticked a box saying she is 'Black or African American'. Appen, a gig-worker company then employing over one million contractors labeling photographs, text and other data, later apologised and claimed the “optional question” was “used to ensure diverse datasets are included in the collection and annotation used to train computer vision algorithms.” The incident was seen to highlight inappropriate governance and poor transparency at Appen. It also played into a broader debate about diversity within Australia's technology sector, amidst perceptions the industry remains dominated by white males. System 🤖 Appen Developer: Appen Country: USA; Australia Sector: Technology Purpose: Determine skin colour Technology: Computer vision Issue: Bias/discrimination; Employment; Privacy/surveillance Timeline ⏰ July 2023 . Appen scored poorly in a report from the University of Oxford’s Internet Institute into the conditions of AI gig workers. Companies that employ AI gig workers uniformly fail to meet a basic threshold of labour rights standards, the report argued.

Date it happened
2021-05-01
Organisation involved
Appen
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.