← the record
AIAAIC-0630

Italian car insurers discriminate using place of birth

Car drivers in Italy were charged different insurance premiums depending on their birthplace, triggering accusations of discrimination based on national identity and the against drivers born in certain Italian cities. A 2021 study (pdf) by researchers at the Universities of Padua, Udine, and Carnegie Mellon found t hat a driver born in Laos may be charged over EUR 1,000 more than a driver born in Milan with an otherwise identical profile. The study also found that birthplace and gender had a direct and sizeable impact on the prices quoted to drivers, despite national and international regulations against their use. In 2012, Italy’s Institute for the Supervision of Insurance (IVASS) and National Anti-Racial Discrimination Office (UNAR) issued soft regulation to encourage car insurance companies to avoid using nationality-related factors as inputs to risk models. But the practice has been made more opaque and insidious when insurance companies started using algorithms to calculate risk premiums, according to AlgorithmWatch. System 🤖 Operator: Linear; Genertel; Mps; Quixa; Con.Te Developer: Linear; Genertel; Mps; Quixa; Con.Te Country: Italy Sector: Banking/financial services Purpose: Calculate insurance premium Technology: Pricing algorithm Issue: Bias/discrimination Legal, regulatory 👩🏼‍⚖️ A.S.G.I. – ASSOCIAZIONE STUDI GIURIDICI SULL’IMMIGRAZIONE v LINEAR SPA (pdf) Investigations, assessments, audits 👁️ Fabris A. et al (2021). Algorithmic Audit of Italian Car Insurance: Evidence of Unfairness in Access and Pricing (pdf) Fusco G., Porrini D. (2020). LESS DISCRIMINATION, MORE GENDER INEQUALITY: THE CASE OF THE ITALIAN MOTOR-VEHICLE INSURANCE Borselli A. (2018). Insurance by Algorithm

Date it happened
2012-01-01
Organisation involved
Linear; Genertel; Mps; Quixa; Con.Te
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.