← the record
AIAAIC-0638

BookCorpus large language dataset

The NHS General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR) is a system that collects, stores and manages data from General Practitioners (GPs) across England. In its own words , it is 'used every day to improve health, care and services through planning and research in England, helping to find better treatments and improve patient care.' D ataset 🤖 General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR) website 🔗 Released: 2021 Developer: NHS Digital Country: UK Sector: Govt - health Purpose: Centralise patient records Type: Database/dat aset Technique: Transparency, accountability 🙈 The NHS patient medical history data store has been criticised for poor transparency across a number of areas. Limited public awareness of data collection and usage practices Lack of clear opt-out mechanisms for patients Insufficient detail on which third parties can access the data and for what purposes Inadequate disclosure of data anonymisation and security measures Unclear policies on data retention periods and deletion processes Limited patient access to audit trails showing who has viewed their records Insufficient transparency around AI/algorithm use Lack of regular public reporting on data breaches or misuse incidents. Resource s 📃 NHS Digital. About the GPDPR programme Risks, harms 🛑 The UK NHS patient medical history data store is seen to pose risks of privacy breaches, unauthorised access to sensitive health information, potential discrimination based on medical history, and the erosion of patient trust in healthcare confidentiality - if not properly secured and managed. Incidents, issues 🔥 Opaque UK plan to share patient data with third parties backfires

Organisation involved
Google; Amazon; OpenAI; Samsung
Product, system or model
BookCorpus
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.