Amazon Ring video doorbell ruled to invade neighbour privacy
The use of a Ring doorbell by a UK house owner violated the privacy of his neighbour, a judge ruled. In a landmark case, Dr. Mary Fairhurst successfully argued that the Ring doorbells installed by her neighbor, Jon Woodard, violated data protection laws and contributed to harassment. The court found that the devices captured personal data from individuals unaware of their presence, including audio recordings that were particularly problematic. Judge Melissa Clarke emphasised that the automatic audio recording feature, which was not able to be disabled until 2020, constituted a breach of the UK Data Protection Act and GDPR regulations. The ruling was seen to highlight the potential harms associated with these kinds of surveillance devices, including emotional distress and privacy violations for individuals living nearby. System 🤖 Amazon Ring Developer: Amazon Country: UK Sector: Consumer goods Purpose: Strengthen security Technology : Computer vision Issue: Accountability; Privacy/surveillance Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ Fairhurst v Woodard Investigations, assessments, audits 👁️ NYU School of Law Policing Project. Ring Neighbors Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Audit
- Date it happened
- 2021-10-01
- Organisation involved
- Amazon
- Product, system or model
- Amazon Ring
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.