Amazon India accused of rigging search engine to promote 'own' brands
Amazon India was accused of running a "systematic" programme of copying other companies' products and promoting them by manipulating its own search results. Reuters obtained thousands of pages of internal Amazon documents that appear to show Amazon India employees used 'search seeding', 'search sparkles' and other techniques so that the company’s own label product lines, such as AmazonBasics and Solimo, would appear 'in the first 2 or three … search results' on Amazon.in. The documents reveal how Amazon’s private-brands team in India secretly exploited internal data from Amazon.in to copy products sold by other companies, and then offered them on its platform . The employees also manipulated Amazon’s search results so that the company’s products would appear in the first 2 or three search results when customers were shopping on Amazon.in . A popular shirt brand in India, John Miller, was a victim of Amazon's strategy, with the company deciding to “follow the measurements of” John Miller shirts down to the neck circumference and sleeve length . Amazon denied the accusations and stated that their policy strictly prohibits the use or sharing of non-public, seller-specific data for the benefit of any seller, including sellers of private brands. System 🤖 Search engine algorithm Developer: Amazon Country: India Sector: Retail Purpose: Rank content/search results Technology: Search engine algorithm Issue: Accountability; Competition/monopolisation; Copyright; Transparency Investigations, assessments, audits 👁️ Reuters (2021). Amazon copied products and rigged search results to promote its own brands, documents show The Markup (2021). Amazon puts its own brands above better rated products
- Date it happened
- 2021-10-01
- Organisation involved
- Amazon
- Product, system or model
- Amazon A9
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.