Waymo Driver

Waymo Driver is an autonomous driving system developed by Waymo, a subsidiary of Google owner Alphabet. Waymo Driver is designed to handle the entire driving task without human intervention. Unlike driver assistance systems, it does not require a human driver to be ready to take control. The system uses a combination of cameras and sensors to perceive its environment, and artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to process sensor data, predict the behaviour of other road users, and make driving decisions in real-time. As of November 2025, Waymo operates commercial robotaxi services in Pho e nix (Arizona), San Francisco (California), Los Angeles (California), Atlanta (Georgia), and Austin (Texas). Safety Waymo has a commendable safety record when measured against the safety performance of human drivers in the same operating environments. As of June 2025, the company claim s it's autonomous driving technologies have resulted in 91 per cent fewer so-called "Serious Injury or Worse Crashes" and 80 percent fewer crashes where any injury (minor, moderate, or serious) was reported. Waymo's main safety issue is not high-speed, serious accidents caused by Waymo Driver, but rather low-speed, property-damage incidents caused by the software misjudging its surroundings. Nonetheless, the system presents a wide range of risks, and has caused real harms, including: Physical safety. Incidents involving Waymo vehicles have resulted in serious injuries and at least one fatality (as of early 2025). Property damage. Waymo Driver has caused collisions resulting in property damage to public infrastructure and private property by striking roadway barriers, gates, chains, utility poles, fire hydrants, and other cars. Traffic disruption. Waymo vehicles frequently cause traffic jams, bottlenecks, and delays when the system encounters an "edge case" (e.g., a complex construction zone, an unusual object, or aggressive driver behaviour) and defaults to an overly cautious stop. Public service disruption. Unusual Waymo behaviour or disabled vehicles require police and fire department intervention to clear traffic and manage the scene. Public sector revenue loss. The rise of autonomous ride-hailing such as Waymo Driver could lead to a decline in the need for human-driven parking, resulting in lost revenue from parking meters, garages, and traffic fines for municipalities, impacting city budgets. Over-reliance . Drivers may become over-reliant on autonomous driving s ystems like Waymo Driver and pay less attention to the road, resulting in accidents. There is also the risk of forgetting basic driving skills, which could be problematic if manual intervention is required. Privacy loss. Waymo Driver is fundamentally a data-collecting platform, which creates significant surveillance and privacy risks. Waymo vehicles are equipped with an array of sensors (LiDAR, cameras) that record the public space, including pedestrians, cyclists, and other drivers who have not consented to being filmed, in high definition continuously, far beyond the visual scope of any human driver. Thus the fleet may create a roving surveillance network that eliminates anonymity in public spaces. In addition, Waymo's Terms of Service state that it will comply with law enforcement requests for data (such as warrants and subpoenas), thereby potentially turning the autonomous fleet into a tool for state surveillance, where the car's private data can be used against third parties or passengers in court. Equally, Waymo could expose or otherwise compromise the personal data of its customers and employees. Equally, hackers could access Waymo systems and steal personal information. Le gal complexity and cost . Concerns exist about who would be liable in the event of an accident involving a Waymo autonomous vehicle, and how the company's insurance policies would cover damages. For victims of a Waymo-involved crash, pursuing compensation involves a complex product liability claim against

Organisation involved

Alphabet/Waymo

Product, system or model

Waymo Driver

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.