← the record
AIAAIC-0828

US prison inmate AI call monitoring plan raises privacy, bias concerns

US prisons rolled out out an AI-based system that scans inmates' phone calls, prompting concerns about privacy, surveillance and discrimination. Intended to keep prisons and jails safe, Leo Technologies' Verus system uses Amazon speech-to-text technology based on keywords to identify and transcribe prisoners' phone calls. However, groups such as Access Now, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Worth Rises expressed concerns that it would abuse the privacy rights of family members and others with whom prisoners are talking. Another issue is discrimination. Research shows voice-to-text tools are significantly more inaccurate for Black voices and a higher percentage of Black people are detained or jailed in the US. Surveillance was also considered a concern, with Reuters quoting documents that revealed instances of prisons and detention centres using Verus for purposes beyond maintaining safety, for example identifying conversations that would help them win court cases, and monitoring COVID-19. The Intercept had earlier reported that prison officials in several US states had been using Verus to scan inmate calls for COVID-19 mentions and to flag complaints about the quality of prison response to the pandemic. System 🤖 Verus 🔗 Operator: Suffolk County Sheriff's Office; Multiple Developer: LEO Technologies Country: U SA Sector: Govt - justice Purpose: Improve safety Technology: Speech-to-text; Machine learning Issue: Bias/discrimination; Privacy; Surveillance

Date it happened
2022-02-01
Organisation involved
Suffolk County Sheriff's Office; Calhoun County Jail, Alabama; Multiple
Product, system or model
Verus
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.