← the record
AIAAIC-0882

San Francisco police 'killer robot' plan shot down

A policy authorising the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) to use military-style weapons, including remote-controlled robots, to kill suspects was put on hold by the city's supervisors. According to the SFPD, it's existing armoury of 17 Remotec and QinetiQ robots could be equipped with explosives 'to contact, incapacitate, or disorient [a] violent, armed, or dangerous suspect' in 'extreme circumstances to save or prevent further loss of innocent lives.' Late November 2022, San Francisco's board of supervisors approved a policy that lets police robots 'be used as a deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent and outweighs any other force option available.' However, the decision resulted in an immediate backlash from civil rights groups. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) argued it was typical police-military mission creep. The San Francisco Public Defender’s office warned that granting police 'the ability to kill community members remotely' went against the city’s progressive values. A week later the boad suspended the policy, sending it back to back to committee for further discussion. System 🤖 Remotec robot QinetiQ robot Documents 📃 https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=11449771&GUID=9FC57C5A-6E68-4485-A989-632C3837B909 Operator: San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) Developer: Remotec; QinetiQ Country: USA Sector: Govt - police Purpose: Strengthen security Technology: Robotics Issue: Safety; Scope creep/normalisation

Date it happened
2022-12-01
Organisation involved
San Francisco Police Department (SFPD)
Product, system or model
Remotec F5A; QinetiQ Talon
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.