Zarya of the Dawn AI image copyright ownership
AI-generated images used in the comic book Zarya of the Dawn should not have been granted copyright protection, the US Copyright Office ruled . Generative AI systems such as Midjourney , Dall-E , Novel AI , Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT have fueled persistent suspicions and complaints amongst creative communities about the use of their work without permission or acknowledgement. The Office stated that Kashtanova 'is the author of the Work’s text as well as the selection, coordination, and arrangement of the Work’s written and visual elements,' and that her authorship is protected by copyright. But, it said, 'the images in the Work that were generated by the Midjourney technology are not the product of human authorship,' and that copyright should only cover 'the expressive material that she created.' The Copyright Office had originally granted Kashtanova the right to copyright register the book in September 2022. But a month later, having seen Kashtanova stating on social media that the book's image s had been produced using AI-image generator Midjourney , it said would reconsider its decision because the application had failed to disclose Midjourney's role. In November 2022, Kashtanova had appealed the Copyright Office's decision to reconsider the application, calling the Office's final decision was 'great news', and that it covers 'a lot of uses for the people in the AI art community.' System 🤖 Midjourney Operator: Kris Kashtanova Developer: Kris Kashtanova; Midjourney Country: USA Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts Purpose: Generate images Technology: Text-to-image; Neural network; Deep learning; Machine learning Issue: Copyright; Ethics/values Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ United States Copyright Office decision (pdf) (2023)
- Date it happened
- 2022-10-01
- Organisation involved
- Kris Kashtanova
- Product, system or model
- Midjourney
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.