Amazon Go fails to inform NYC customers about facial recognition
A pair of lawsuits a ll eged that Amazon failed to inform customers about its use of facial and body biometrics scanning at its cashierless Go retail stores in New York for over a year. According to a class-action lawsuit filed by Rodriguez Perez, Amazon had not informed him that his body and palm were scanned. Another suit , filed in February 2023 by Richard McCall, claims his palm was scanned. Both are alleged to be in violation of New York City's 2021 Biometric Identifier Information Law . The law requires all New York City businessses to post a sign informing customers or visitors that their biometrics are being recorded. Amazon denied the claims, telling Gizmodo , 'We do not use facial recognition technology in any of our stores, and claims made otherwise are false.' 'Only shoppers who choose to enroll in Amazon One and choose to be identified by hovering their palm over the Amazon One device have their palm-biometric data securely collected, and these individuals are provided the appropriate privacy disclosures during the enrollment process,' it said. First launched in 2018, Amazon Go is supposed to showcase the company's automated Just Walk Out system, which it says uses computer vision, deep learning algorithms, and sensor fusion to track consumers’ ' virtual carts' to notate when they put an item in their cart or take it off the tab if they remove it. System 🤖 Amazon Just Walk Out 🔗 Operator: Amazon Developer: Amazon Country: USA Sector: Retail Purpose: Verify identity Technology: Facial recognition; Computer vision; Deep learning Issue: Accountability; Privacy; Transparency Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ Alfredo Rodriguez Perez v Amazon (2023) McCall v Amazon (2023) NYC Biometric Identifier Disclosure Sign template (pdf)
- Date it happened
- 2023-03-01
- Organisation involved
- Amazon
- Product, system or model
- Just Walk Out
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.