UK algorithm delays young peoples' liver transplants
Young people are being forced to wait four times longer than they used to for liver transplants by an UK National Health Service (NHS) algorithm supposed to provide a 'more objective way of matching organs to patients'. The Transplant Benefit Score (TBS) algorithm, which prioritises patients most likely to die soon by looking at 21 recipient parameters, such as age, disease type and severity, and seven donor ones, was introduced in 2018 with the aim of cutting waiting list deaths on the waiting. Those most likely to die soon tend to be older people, yet NHS figures (pdf) show younger people must wait 156 days longer on average for a transplant than patients over 60. The findings prompted concerns that the system may be unfair, with liver transplant surgeon Professor Nigel Heaton telling the BBC that his younger patients tend to be born with liver disease or to have developed it early in life through no fault of their own. It is also seen to highlight the complexities of designing a system that is viewed as fair for everyone. Predictive analytics Predictive analytics is a form of business analytics applying machine learning to generate a predictive model for certain business applications. Source: Wikipedia 🔗 System 🤖 Transplant Benefit Score 🔗 Documents 📃 NHS (2018). T he new National Liver Offering Scheme: Frequently Asked Questions (pdf) NHS (2022). ANNUAL REPORT ON LIVER TRANSPLANTATION (pdf) Operator: NHS Blood and Transplant Developer: Country: U K Sector: Health Purpose: Allocate liver transplants Technology: Prediction algorithm Issue: Accountability; Fairness; Safety; Transparency
- Date it happened
- 2023-08-01
- Organisation involved
- NHS Blood and Transplant
- Product, system or model
- Transplant Benefit Score (TBS)
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.