← the record
AIAAIC-1185

AI translations jeopardise US asylum applications

The use of AI-powered language apps by the US immigration system is jeopardising the applications of asylum seekers, resulting in unfair and highly consequential decisions. US immigration authorities say they provide migrants with a human interpreter when needed. However, increasingly they use automated services such as Google Translate and US Customs and Border Protection's (CPB) in-house CBP Translate app to help communicate with migrants throughout the asylum process. However, critics note that machine learning-powered translation tools can be unreliable, especially for languages different to English or that are less well documente d, such as Haitian Creole, Dari, or Pashto. And the consequences can be severe if translations are inaccurate. In one instance, a n asylum claim made by a Pashto-speaking Afghan refugee was denied by the US government due to an inaccurate automated translation tool. System 🤖 CPB Tr anslate Google Translate 🔗 Lionbridge Microsoft Translator Transperfect Translations Operator: Customs and Border Protection (CPB) Developer: Alphabet/Google; Customs and Border Protection (CPB); Lionbridge; Microsoft; Transperfect Translations Country: USA Sector: Govt - immigration Purpose: Translate asylum claims Technology: NLP/text analysis; Neural network; Deep learning; Machine learning; Reinforcement learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Bias/discrimination - language

Date it happened
2023-01-01
Organisation involved
Customs and Border Protection (CPB)
Product, system or model
CPB Translate; Google Translate; Lionbridge; Microsoft Translator; Transperfect Translations
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.