← the record
AIAAIC-1226

News publishers complain OpenAI uses articles to train ChatGPT

Prominent news publishers accused OpenAI of using their articles without their knowledge or consent to train its AI models and systems, including ChatGPT. CNN , Reuters , The News York Times , the Wall Street Journal , and other publishers accused AI companies and developers, including OpenAI, of using their articles to train their AI and machine learning software in violation of their terms of use. In October 2023, News/Media Alliance, an US-based initiative representing over 2,200 publishers, argued that AI firms regularly used the information in news stories without authori s ation, and violate laws protecting intellectual property in a white paper and comments to the US Copyright Office. The group’s research claimed datasets, such as the C4 language dataset , 'significantly' overweighted content from news, magazines and digital media sources, using it 5 to almost 100 times as frequently as other content. It also suggested chatbots copy and use publisher content in their outputs to users, putting them in competition with news outlets. System 🤖 ChatGPT Operator: ABC News; Axios; BBC; Bloomberg; CNN; Condé Nast; Daily Mail & General Trust; Dow Jones; Disney; ESPN; Guardian News & Media; Hearst; Insider; The Atlantic; The New York Times; Reuters; Vox Media Developer: OpenAI Country: USA ; UK Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts Purpose: Generate text Technology: Chatbot; Generative AI; Machine learning Issue: Copyright; Tr ansparency

Date it happened
2023-02-01
Organisation involved
ABC News; Axios; BBC; Bloomberg; CNN; Condé Nast; Daily Mail & General Trust; Dow Jones; Disney; ESPN; Guardian News & Media; Hearst; Insider; The Atlantic; The New York Times; Reuters; Vox Media
Product, system or model
ChatGPT
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.