UK pressure group accuses PimEyes of surveillance, privacy abuse
UK privacy advocacy group Big Brother Watch filed a complaint with the country's privacy watchdog over the facial recognition search engine PimEyes. In a formal complaint (pdf) t o the UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) , Big Brother Watch accused PimEyes of unlawfully processing the biometric data of millions of UK citizens, arguing it failed to obtain permission from those whose images had been analysed. It went to say that PimEyes enabled 'surveillance and stalking on a scale previously unimaginable' by making it easy for users to identify where an individual worked or lived. The tool, it said, could easily be used by potential employers, university admissions officers, domestic abusers or stalkers, and could threaten 'end anonymity as we know it'. PimEyes CEO Giorgi Gobronidze responded by saying the service posed fewer stalking risks than social media services. ➕ May 2023. The ICO said (pdf) it had decided not to formally investigate PimEyes, and confirmed that the company was being investigated by another data protection authority. System 🤖 PimEyes Documents 📃 PimEyes (2022). PimEyes' Statement on allegations made by Big Brother Watch Operator: Big Brother Watch Developer: PimEyes Country: UK Sector: Technology Purpose: Identify individuals Technology: Facial recognition Issue: Privacy; Safety; Surveillance; Transparency Regulation ⚖️ UK Data Protection Act 2018 Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ UK ICO (2023). Response to Freedom of Information request (IC-228371-K0N0) (pdf) Big Brother Watch/AWO (2022). SUBMISSION TO THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO CARRIBEX LTD T/A PIMEYES UNLAWFUL PROCESSING OF BIOMETRIC DATA (pdf)
- Date it happened
- 2022-11-01
- Organisation involved
- PimEyes
- Product, system or model
- PimEyes
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.