Palworld accused of plagiarising Pokemon designs using AI
The release of multi-player survival game Palworld has been met with accusations that it plagiarised Pokemon for its creature designs. Created by Japanese developer Pocket Pair, Palworld combines the open-world survival genre with Pokemon-inspired 'Pals' creatures, some of which are nearly identical to those in Pokemon, and others look like two Pokemon fused together. raising concerns about plagiarism. Pocket Pair CEO responded that the character concepts were mostly designed by a single graduate student hired in 2021 following a hiring spree for new illustrators. Users and commentators pointed out that Pocket Pair has a history of using generative AI tools, and that its CEO had talked publicly about how he believed generative AI tools could one day be sophisticated enough to avoid copyright issues. System 🤖 Palworld Operator: Developer: Country: Japan Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts Purpose: Generate images Technology: Text-to-image; Generative adversarial network (GAN); Neural network; Deep learning; Machine learning Issue: Cheating/plagiarism; Copyright; Ethics/values; Transparency N ews, commentary, analysis 🗞️ https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/palworld-embroiled-in-ai-and-pokemon-plagiarism-controversy/ https://gamerant.com/palworld-pokemon-controversy-stolen-designs-every-pal-similarity-explained/ https://www.thefpsreview.com/2024/01/20/palworld-aka-pokemon-with-guns-is-being-accused-of-plagiarism-after-selling-2-million-copies-on-its-first-day-of-early-access/ https://automaton-media.com/en/news/20240122-25873/ https://www.ign.com/articles/pokmon-fans-are-coming-for-palworld-with-a-vengeance https://www.zleague.gg/theportal/cloud-plays-palworld-brings-huge-controversies-and-breaks-the-internet-2/ https://www.vg247.com/palworld-3-millions-copies-sold-plagiarism
- Date it happened
- 2024-01-01
- Organisation involved
- Palworld
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.