← the record
AIAAIC-1312

Takaful' poverty targeting algorithm unfairly excludes poor Jordanians

The kingdom of Jordan was accused of using a 'flawed' algorithm to calculate the amount of aid for its citizens, excluding some who are impoverished, hungry or otherwise struggling. The Takaful 'poverty targeting' cash transfer algorithm run by Jordan's National Aid Fund and funded by the World Bank assesses whether aid applicants meet basic criteria such as whether families are headed by a Jordanian citizen and living under the poverty line. The algorithm estimates and ranks families' income and wealth using 57 socio-economic indicators. Families that own cars less than five years old or businesses worth at least 3,000 dinars (approximately USD 4,200) are automatically disqualified. However, according to Human Rights Watch, the system is undermined by an opaque system based on inaccurate and unreliable data about people's finances, stereotypes about poverty, and discriminatory policies - notably against women - thereby d epriving people of their rights to social security and resulting in increased social tensions and inequality. The World Bank responded by saying it would refine the algorithm, whilst noting that Takaful has proven to be one of the most cost-effective poverty reduction programmes currently operating in Jordan. System 🤖 Jordan National Aid Fund 🔗 Operator: Jordan National Aid Fund Developer: The World Bank Country: Jordan Sector: Govt - welfare Purpose: Calculate aid eligibility and distribution Technology: Ranking algorithm Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Bias/discrimination - gender ; Transparency

Date it happened
2023-01-01
Organisation involved
Jordan National Aid Fund
Product, system or model
Unified Cash Transfer Program/Takaful
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.