Amazon France fined for excessive automated monitoring of workers
Amazon was fined EUR 32 million by France's privacy regulator for the 'excessive' and 'illegal' monitoring of staff activity and performance using scanners and several software systems. Amazon France Logistique had been using handheld scanners and three indicators to measure the producivity and inactivity of its employees, including for tasks such as putting an item on a shelf, taking an item off a shelf, putting an item into a box, and time spent on breaks. According to France's National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL), 'the implementation of a system measuring interruptions of activity so precisely and leading to the employee potentially having to justify each break or interruption was illegal' and had breached the EU's GDPR principle of data minimisation and the lawfulness of the processing. The CNI also took issue with Amazon's transparency, or lack thereof. Before April 2020, temporary workers had not been informed before their data was collected, and employees were not properly told about video surveillance systems. Amazon disagreed with the CNIL's conclusions, which it described as 'factually incorrect.' System 🤖 Amazon France 🔗 Documents 📃 Amazon France (2024). Déclaration d'Amazon à propos de la décision de la CNIL Operator: Amazon France Logistique employees, visitors Developer: Amazon France Logistique Country: France Sector: Trans port/logistics Purpose: Monitor employee performance Technology: Handheld scanner Issue: Employment; Necessity/proportionality; Privacy; Surveillance; Transparency Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ CNIL (2024). Employee monitoring: CNIL fined AMAZON FRANCE LOGISTIQUE €32 million European Data Protection Board (2024). Employee monitoring: French SA fined Amazon France Logistique €32 million
- Date it happened
- 2020-01-01
- Organisation involved
- Amazon France Logistique
- Product, system or model
- Stow Machine Gun indicator; Idle Time indicator, Latency under ten minutes indicator
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.