← the record
AIAAIC-1358

Chicago watchdog finds ShotSpotter 'rarely finds gun crime'

Chicago's Inspector General issued a report saying that the use of the ShotSpotter gunfire detection system by the city's police 'rarely produce[s] documented evidence of a gun-related crime, investigatory stop, or recovery of a firearm'. Having analysed 50,176 ShotSpotter notifications from January 2020 to May 2021, t he Inspector General concluded 'CPD responses to ShotSpotter alerts rarely produce evidence of a gun-related crime, rarely give rise to investigatory stops, and even less frequently lead to the recovery of gun crime-related evidence during an investigatory stop. ' The report also questioned the 'operational value' of the system and , based at least in part on aggregate ShotSpotter data, found that it increased the incidence of stop and frisk tactics by police officers in some neighbourhoods . The finding prompted was the Electronic Frontier Foundation to criticise ShotSpotter as 'a dangerous and humiliating intrusion on bodily autonomy and freedom of movement.' ➕ February 2024. Chicago announced it would not renew its three-year, USD 33 million contract with ShotSpotter and would stop using the system in September 2024. System 🤖 ShotSpotter Documents 📃 SoundThinking. Why the Chicago OIG Report is Misunderstood Operator: Chicago Police Department Developer: SoundThinking Country: USA Sector: Govt - police Purpose: Detect gunfire Technology: Gunshot detection system; Deep learning; Neural network; Machine learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Effectiveness/value; Robustness

Date it happened
2021-01-01
Organisation involved
Chicago Police Department
Product, system or model
ShotSpotter
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.