Judge overturns shooting conviction citing ShotSpotter unreliability
A judge overturned a criminal conviction of a man accused of attempting to murder a US police officer on the basis that the ShotSpotter crime-fighting tool used by the police was not reliable enough . Silvon Simmons was stopped and shot in the back three times by Rochester, New York, police looking for a suspicious vehicle. Simmons was charged with firing first at officers when running away, despite ShotSpotter initially not detecting any gunshots and the system's algorithms ruling that the sounds came from helicopter rotors. ShotSpotter analyst Paul Greene later said that there had been four gunshots - the number of times police fired at Simmons, missing once. However County Court Judge Christopher Ciaccio ruled that ShotSpotter was unreliable, reversing the weapons possession conviction against Simmons. Simmons had earlier been acquitted of attempted murder by a jury. Simmons spent eighteen months in jail before his acquittal and since the incident has suffered from anxiety, depression and other mental health issues. System 🤖 ShotSpotter Operator: Rochester Police Department Developer: SoundThinking/ShotSpotter Country: USA Sector: Govt - police Purpose: Detect gunfire Technology: Deep learning; Neural network; Machine learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ Simmons v. Ferrigno, II et al SST (2016). Detailed Forensic Report (pdf)
- Date it happened
- 2016-04-01
- Organisation involved
- Rochester Police Department
- Product, system or model
- ShotSpotter
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.