Adam Toledo killed by Chicago police using ShotSpotter
The use of ShotSpotter by Chicago police led to an officer fatally shooting a 13-year-old boy, prompting reports that its sensors are disproportionately placed in minority communities and activists to call for the city to stop using the system. Thirteen-year-old Adam Toledo was shot dead by police officer Eric Stillman in the Little Village neighbourhood of Chicago after his friend Ruben Roman had fired his gun several times, triggering an alert by ShotSpotter . Police chased Toledo, who was reputedly armed with a gun, into an alleyway and shot him. However, bodycam footage later revealed that Toledo had been unarmed. The incident resulted in public protests and unrest amidst accusations of police brutality and lack of accountability, as well as allegations of racial discrimination in the Chicago Police Department due to its use of ShotSpotter in predominately ethnic minority areas. The controversy also led to media reports accusing police of getting ShotSpotter owner SoundThinking to alter evidence generated by its gunfire detection system, and was seen to have contributed to a February 2024 decision by the City of Chicago to stop using ShotSpotter. ➕ July 2021. Vice News reported that US p olice departments regularly ask SoundThinking to alter or delete alerts generated by ShotSpotter . System 🤖 ShotSpotter Operator: Chicago Police Department Developer: SoundThinking/ShotSpotter Country: USA Sector: Govt - police Purpose: Detect gunfire Technology: Deep learning; Neural network; Machine learning Issue: Accountability; B ias/discrimination; Safety; Transparency
- Date it happened
- 2021-03-01
- Organisation involved
- Chicago Police Department
- Product, system or model
- ShotSpotter
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.