← the record
AIAAIC-1373

Top AI image generators produce misleading election info

AI image generators created election disinformation in 41 percent of cases, including images that could support false claims about candidates or election fraud, according to researchers. A study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) found that f our popular AI image generators - Midjourney , ChatGPT Plus, DreamStudio and Microsoft’s Image Creator - could 'easily' be manipulated into creating deceptive election-related images. Tested using 40 simple text prompts on the theme of the 2024 US presidential election , the systems generated believable images including one showing Joe Biden lying in bed in a hospital, a picture of Donald Trump in a detention cell, and a security camera image showing a man in a sweatshirt using a baseball bat to smash open a ballot collection box. The prompts were devised to mimic criminal actors' attempts to spread false information, and then changed to 'jailbreak' the original requests. Midjourney was found to perform the worst of the tools, failing in 65 percent of test runs. The study raised concerns about how effectively platform policies against producing misleading content were being enforced, and highlighted how the systems could be misused for political purposes. System 🤖 ChatGPT Dreamstudio 🔗 Image Creator 🔗 Midjourney Operator: Microsoft; Midjourney; OpenAI; Stability AI Developer: Microsoft; Midjourney; OpenAI; Stability AI Country: USA Sector: Politics Purpose: Generate images Technology: Text-to-image; Generative adversarial network (GAN); Neural network; Deep learning; Machine learning Issue: Mis/disinformation

Date it happened
2024-03-01
Organisation involved
Microsoft; Midjourney; OpenAI; Stability AI
Product, system or model
ChatGPT Plus; DreamStudio; Image Creator; Midjourney
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.