Worldcoin field-testing methods draw controversy
Worldcoin raised concerns among regulators and privacy advocates around the world due to an alleged lack of transparency regarding the methods the organisation is using to collect people’s data . In April 2022, internal documents shared with Technology Review and Buzzfeed News revealed tha t people signing up for Worldcoin iris scans were complaining about unclear, misleading and unethical marketing practices . Specifically, it was alleged that the organisation was collecting more personal data than it acknowledged, failing to obtain meaningful informed consent, and had not been declaring that it was using user data to train its artificial intelligence models. Furthermore, Orb operators in a number of countries comp lained that they had not be en paid for users they had signed -u p, and faced harassment and arrest under local laws. The controversy was seen to raise serious questions about Worldcoin's governance and transparency, and it’s approach to privacy and data collection. System 🤖 Worldcoin iris biometrics Documents Worldcoin (2022). Responses to MIT Technology Review Operator: Tools for Humanity/Worldcoin Developer: Tools for Humanity/Worldcoin Country: Global Sector: Banking/financial services Purpose: Develop digital identity Technology: Iris scanning; Facial detection; Vital signs detection; Blockchain; Virtual currency Issue: Ethics/values; Privacy; Tran sparency
- Date it happened
- 2023-01-01
- Organisation involved
- Tools for Humanity/Worldcoin
- Product, system or model
- Worldcoin
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.