← the record
AIAAIC-1607

Paris Olympics AI scans fuel surveillance fears

The use of AI to monitor the Paris 2024 Olympic Games raised concerns about surveillance and privacy. In 2023, the French government expanded the legal framework for AI surveillance, allowing for its use during the Olympics and potentially beyond. French authorities have since implemented AI systems to monitor crowds, detect weapons, and identify abandoned packages during the Games. However, civil rights groups and other critics argue that this represents a form of "creeping surveillance" that could normalise intrusive monitoring practices, and voiced strong opposition to the measures, arguing they threaten fundamental rights such as privacy and freedom of expression and that the Olympics provide a pretext for expanding surveillance capabilities under the guise of security. Experts expressed concerns that the technologies could lead to a chilling effect on public behaviour, as individuals modify their actions in response to surveillance. They also highlighted the possibility of misuse and lack of transparency regarding how data is collected and used, and the lack of accuracy associated with AI surveillance systems. System 🤖 ChapsVision 🔗 Flux Vision 🔗 Wintics CityVision 🔗 Videtics Perception 🔗 Operator: Paris Police Prefecture; SNCF Developer: Videtics; Orange Business; ChapsVision; Wintics Country: France Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts; Transport Purpose: Detect abandoned packages; Detect overcrowding Technology: Compu ter vision; Machine learning; Object recognition Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Human/civil rights; Privacy; Surveillance

Date it happened
2023-01-01
Organisation involved
Paris Police Prefecture; SNCF
Product, system or model
ChapsVision; Flux Vision; CityVision; Videtics Perception
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.