Google Autocomplete omits news of Trump assassination attempt
Google's Autocomplete feature came under fire for not providing suggestions related to the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump in July 2024. This omission sparked controversy and accusations of potential election interference. Google users noticed that typing phrases like "assassination attempt on trum" or "president donald" did not yield relevant Autocomplete suggestions. The feature instead suggested historical events or unrelated topics, such as assassination attempts on other presidents or figures, including Harry Truman and Gerald Ford. Critics, including Donald Trump Jr. and Elon Musk, accused Google of elect oral interference, particularly in light of the upcoming 2024 presidential election. Google attributed the results to existing protections against Autocomplete predictions associated with political violence, stating that "no manual action was taken" to suppress information about Trump. The company acknowledged that its systems were out-of-date before the July 13 incident, and said it was working on improvements to ensure its systems were more timely. ➕ July 2024 . G oogle reported that improvements are being rolled out to its Autocomplete systems with some relevant predictions about Trump and the assassination attempt be ginning to appear. Autocomplete Autocomplete, or word completion, is a feature in which an application predicts the rest of a word a user is typing. In Android and iOS smartphones , this is called predictive text. Source: Wikipedia 🔗 System 🤖 Google Autocomplete Operator: Google user s Developer: Alphabet/ Google Country: USA Sector: Politics Purpose: Predict search results Technology: NLP/text analysis; Deep learning; Machine learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Human/civil rights
- Date it happened
- 2024-07-01
- Organisation involved
- Google users
- Product, system or model
- Google Autocomplete
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.