Grok misleads voters about US presidential election
Elon Musk's Grok chatbot disseminated false information regarding the deadlines for several US states’ 2024 presidential ballots, raising questions about its sources and tendency to "hallucinate" false "facts". C iting an X post by a conservative pundit as its source for the information, Grok incorrectly stated that presidential ballot deadlines had passed in nine states, including Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington. The chatbot also wrongly claimed that presumptive Democratic nominee and Vice President Kamala Harris had missed the ballot deadline, and suggested that President Joe Biden's name could not be replaced on these states' ballots due to passed deadline - which is false. In reality, US states do not start printing ballots until after both party conventions, and the Democratic Party will formally nominate its nominee through a virtual roll call vote. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon reportedly traced the misinformation to Grok and tried to inform X about the issue, but received no response. ➕ August 2024 . S ecretaries of state for Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Washington called on Elon Musk (pdf) to update Grok with accurate information about the presidential election. Hallucination (artificial intelligence) In the field of artificial intelligence (AI), a hallucination or artificial hallucination (also called bullshitting, confabulation or delusion) is a response generated by AI that contains false or misleading information presented as fact . Source: Wikipedia 🔗 System 🤖 Grok Operator: Grok users Developer: X Corp Country: USA Sector: Politics Purpose: Generate text Technology: Chatbot; Machine learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Mis/disinformation Legal, regulatory 👩🏼⚖️ Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State. Letter to Elon Musk (pdf)
- Date it happened
- 2024-07-01
- Organisation involved
- X Corp
- Product, system or model
- Grok
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.