← the record
AIAAIC-1661

Illustrator drops Bradford Literary Festival over AI use

The Bradford Literary Festival faced significant backlash after using AI-generated images in its promotional materials for its 2023 event. The controversy erupted when a tweet featuring an AI-generated animated image of a young girl reading was shared online, prompting authors and illustrators to criticise the festival for undermining creative professionals and contributing to the devaluation of artistic work. In one case, book illustrator Chris Mould pulled out because artificial intelligence (AI) was used to produce its publicity images. Due to hold a masterclass at the event, he told the BBC , "How can I stand under their roof and tell people they can go to art school?" In response to the criticism, the festival issued an apology , acknowledging that the use of AI-generated images did not align with its commitment to supporting creative careers. They clarified that while they did not explicitly commission AI-generated illustrations, they also did not exclude them from their brief to the design agency, Lazenby Brown. The festival has since committed to not using AI-generated imagery in the future and has replaced the problematic images with licensed stock photos. The incident highlighted broader concerns within the creative community about the ethical implications of AI in the arts, prompting discussions about the need for clearer guidelines and protections for artists. System 🤖 Unknown Documents 📃 Bradford Literary Festival. Statement Operator: Bradford Literary Festival; Lazenby Brown Developer: Country: UK Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts Purpose: Create art work Technology: Machine learning Issue: Employment; Tr ansparency

Date it happened
2023-01-01
Organisation involved
Bradford Literary Festival; Lazenby Brown
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.