← the record
AIAAIC-1748

Google's AI Overviews recommends parents smear human faeces on balloons

Google's AI Overview feature was ridiculed for suggesting that parents smear human faeces on balloons as a method for potty training children. The bizarre recommendation arose during searches related to teaching children proper wiping techniques during toilet training. In response to queries like "how to teach wiping poo," the AI suggested a method where parents could tape a balloon with faecal matter to a chair and have their child practice wiping it, implying that using actual faeces was acceptable. However, the advice misinterprets a legitimate training technique known as the "balloon method," which involves using fake waste - typically shaving cream or peanut butter - on balloons to simulate the experience of wiping after using the bathroom. The original concept, demonstrated in a 2022 YouTube video by Australian pediatric occupational therapists, is intended to make the learning process fun and hygienic. The therapists explicitly stated they would be using shaving cream, referring to it humorously as "poo" for illustrative purposes. The AI's failure to grasp this highlights the challenges faced by large language models in accurately interpreting nuanced information. Google's spokesperson acknowledged that some AI Overviews may lack quotation marks or context that could clarify these suggestions, leading to misunderstandings about the intended advice. System 🤖 Google AI Overviews Operator: Google users Developer: Google Country: Global Sector: Health Purpose: Generate search results Technology: Generative AI Issue: Accountability; Accuracy/reliability; Mis/disinformation; Transparency

Date it happened
2024-01-01
Organisation involved
Google
Product, system or model
AI Overviews
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.