← the record
AIAAIC-1762

Backlash as Mark Zuckerberg uses AI to illustrate children's book

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg faced significant public backlash after using Meta AI to illustrate a children's book written by his daughter, an act seen by the creative community as a billionaire bypassing human artists in favour of a system trained on uncompensated and non-consensual creative works. During Meta's annual Connect conference, Zuckerberg showcased The Mermaid Crystal , a book illustrated and with a trailer created using Meta's AI tools. In his Instagram post, he expressed pride in this personal project and said that a sequel is already planned. However, critics, particularly from the artistic community, argued that AI undermines the livelihoods of real artists, who it deprives of income. Prominent author Jason Pinter complained that Zuckerberg could have easily hired talented illustrators instead of relying on a computer programme. Many comments echoed Pinter's sentiment, urging Zuckerberg to support actual artists rather than opting for AI-powered solutions. Despite the criticism, some users defended Zuckerberg's choice, suggesting that the personal nature of creating a book with his daughter justified the use of AI and that hiring artists would not necessarily enhance the personal touch he aimed for. The incident highlights the ongoing debate over AI's role in creative fields and its impact on artistic professions. System 🤖 Meta AI Operator: Mark Zuckerberg Developer: Meta Country: USA Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts Purpose: Generate images Technology: Gene rative AI Issue: Appropriation; Employment/labour

Date it happened
2024-10-01
Organisation involved
Meta Platforms
Product, system or model
Meta AI
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.