26 US Members of Congress attacked using porn deepfakes
US Congress, predominantly female lawmakers, have been targeted with sexually explicit deepfakes, according to new research, highlighting the increasing problem of nonconsensual AI-powered intimate imagery in politics and elsewhere. What happened Over 35,000 instances of nonconsensual intimate imagery (NCII) involving 26 unnamed lawmakers were discovered on deepfake platforms by The American Sunlight Project . Of those affected, 25 were women, highlighting a significant gender disparity in the victims of this technology. Most of these images were removed after the researchers alerted the lawmakers' offices, but concerns remain about the potential for re-uploading and distribution of the content. Why it happened The rise in deepfake pornography is attributed to advancements in AI technology, which has made it increasingly easy to create realistic nonconsensual content in seconds. The study found that younger members of Congress were disproportionately targeted and concluded that female lawmakers were 70 times more likely to be victims compared to their male counterparts. The lack of comprehensive regulations around deepfakes exacerbates the issue, allowing perpetrators to exploit the technology with minimal repercussions. What it means The situation poses serious implications for women in politics and public life, potentially discouraging their participation due to fears of harassment and reputational damage. Experts like researcher and writer Nina Jankowicz emphasise that the phenomenon sends a chilling message to women about the consequences of raising their voices in public forums. System 🤖 Unknown Developer: Country: USA Sector: Politics Purpose: Damage reputation Technology: Deepfake Issue: Authenticity/integrity; Privacy/surveillance; Safety
- Date it happened
- 2024-12-01
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.