France's Lucie chatbot tells people to eat cow's eggs
An AI chatbot backed by the French government was taken offline shortly after its launch due to a series of nonsensical responses, highlighting the importance of the rigorous testing of public AI systems. What happened Launched on January 23, 2025, Lucie quickly garnered criticism for its absurd outputs, with users reporting that when asked about cow's eggs, the bot incorrectly claimed they were produced by cows and were a source of protein. Additionally, it miscalculated basic math problems, such as answering 5×(3+2) with 17 instead of the correct 25. The chatbot's inability to provide accurate information led to widespread ridicule on social media, prompting the Linagora Group to disable public access three days after its launch. Why it happened The rapid backlash stemmed from Lucie's premature launch as an academic research initiative without adequate testing or communication regarding its limitations. Linagora admitted they were "swept away by excitement" and failed to prepare for public scrutiny. The project aimed to provide a French alternative to dominant AI models like ChatGPT but was not equipped with necessary safeguards against generating nonsensical or inappropriate content. What it means The fracas highlights the importance of the rigorous testing of AI systems , not least when government-backed projects are involved. More broadly, it is seen to reflect poorly on France's ambitions in the AI sector and raises questions about the readiness of such technologies for public use. System 🤖 Lucie 🔗 Developer: Linagora Group Country: France Sector: Multiple Purpose: General purpose Technology: Chat bot; Generative AI; Machine learning Issue: Accuracy/reliability Resource s 📃 Linagora. Lucie wishes you a happy new year 2025
- Date it happened
- 2025-01-01
- Organisation involved
- Linagora Group
- Product, system or model
- Lucie
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.