Chinese influence operation uses ChatGPT to manipulate Latin American public opinion
A Chinese influence operation used ChatGPT to generate and disseminate anti-US propaganda in Latin American media, according to OpenAI . What happened Dubbed "Sponsored Discontent," the campaign involved the creation of Spanish-language articles critical of the United States, which were subsequently published in mainstream newspapers across Mexico, Peru and Ecuador. The articles focused on U.S. political discord and issues such as drug addiction , homelessness, raci sm and crime . Some of these pieces appeared as sponsored content in Latin American publications . The operation used ChatGPT accounts to generate Spanish-language articles by translating and expanding Chinese content, and produce English-language comments attacking Chinese dissident Cai Xia. The content was created during business hours in mainland China, with some articles bearing the byline of a company called Jil Yousen Culture Communication Co.. Why it happened The influence operation is part of China's broader strategy to expand its leverage in Latin America, encompassing economic entanglements, critical infrastructure investments, and information control. By manipulating public opinion through seemingly legitimate news sources, China aims to reshape regional alignments and counterbalance U.S. influence in the region. What it means The incident highlights the growing concern about AI's potential to amplify disinformation and accelerate nation-state-backed influence operations. System 🤖 ChatGPT Operator: Developer: OpenAI Country: Ecuador; Mexico; Peru Sector: Politi cs Purpose: Manipulate public opinion Technology: Generative AI; Machine learning Issue: Mis /disinformation; Transparency
- Date it happened
- 2025-02-01
- Organisation involved
- Government of China
- Product, system or model
- ChatGPT
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.