Sora AI video generator accused of perpetuating sexist, racist bias
OpenAI's Sora video generator has been criticised for perpetuating sexist, racist, and ableist stereotypes, raising concerns about its development and actual ad potential impacts on society. What happened A WIRED investigation involving a series of prompts describing actions such as "a person walking" or job titles such as "a pilot" revealed that Sora frequently produces biased outputs, such as depicting CEOs and professors exclusively as men, flight attendants as women, and limited racial diversity in its representations. It also stereotypes disabled individuals and ignored prompts for broader representation, amplifying harmful stereotypes and marginalising certain groups. For example, pompts for gay couples mostly returned conventionally attractive white men in their late 20s with the same hairstyles. Why it happened The biases stem from Sora's training data, which reflects societal prejudices embedded in the datasets, and is seen to highlight OpenAI's apparent inability or unwillingness to align its products with mainstream human values and to make its product "safe". OpenAI has since acknowledged the issue and cited ongoing efforts to reduce bias through adjustments in training data and moderation techniques. What it means Women, people of colour, and individuals with disabilities are forced to suffer Sora's exclusionary narratives and stereotypes. Less directly, society faces the risk of heightened unrepresentative and discriminatory information from Sora and equivalent products. The findings are seen to highlight the need for the ethical development of AI products and services. System 🤖 Sora Developer: OpenAI Country: USA Sector: Multiple Purpose: Gen erate video Technology: Text-to-video; Machine learning Issue: Bias/discrimination; Representation Investigations, assessments, audits 👁️ WIRED. OpenAI’s Sora Is Plagued by Sexist, Racist, and Ableist Biases
- Date it happened
- 2025-03-01
- Product, system or model
- Sora
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.