Georgia-based group uses deepfake celebrity ads to push fake cryptocurrency schemes
A Georgia-based criminal network scammed over 6,000 victims globally out of USD 35 million (GBP 27 million) using deepfake videos and fabricated news articles featuring celebrities to promote fraudulent cryptocurrency and investment schemes. What happened Operating from call centers in Tbilisi, Georgia, t he group created fake ads on Facebook and Google featuring manipulated endorsements from UK celebrities Martin Lewis , Zoe Ball, and Ben Fogle. Victims were lured into transferring savings to sham investment platforms, with UK citizens losing approximately GBP 9 million. Leaked data shared with the Guardian and other news publishers by Swedish television channel SVT and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) revealed scammers used highly aggressive tactics, including impersonating authorities to extract additional fees from victims trying to recover fund. Some victims reported losing their life savings and having suicidal thoughts. Celebrities faced reputational damage and personal distress, with Ben Fogle noting his mother was targeted. Why it happened The fraud exploited gaps in social media platforms’ ad verification systems, despite policies prohibiting deceptive content. Affiliate marketers paid to distribute fake articles and deepfakes on Meta and Google platforms, while the Georgian operatives benefited from lax local enforcement. Regulatory delays to the UK’s Online Safety Act, which contains provisions on scam ads not taking effect until 2026, further enabled the schemes. What it means The case raises questions about global enforcement against cross-border cybercrime networks and the ethical responsibilities of platforms profiting from ad revenue. It also highlights the need for technology companies to proactively detect and remove scam content, rather than relying on post-hoc reporting.
- Date it happened
- 2024-01-01
This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.
This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.