← the record
AIAAIC-2059

McDonald’s AI chatbot exposes 64 million job applicants' data

A security flaw in McDonald’s AI-powered recruitment chatbot exposed the personal information of up to 64 million job applicants, highlight ing the need for strong cybersecurity and governance over third-party AI platforms. What happened Researchers discovered in June 2025 that the administration interface of McDonald’s recruitment platform McHire.com, powered by the Olivia chatbot from Paradox.ai, was protected only by default credentials (“123456”) and lacked multi-factor authentication. The flaw allowed unauthorised access to applicants’ names, emails, phone numbers, home, email and IP addresses, job applied for, resume details, work history, personality test results, and chat transcripts of their interviews. While the breach was patched quickly and there are no current indications of malicious exploitation, the potential for widespread data misuse is extremely high. Why it happened The incident stemmed from elementary security oversights - including weak default credentials and insufficiently protected APIs. McDonald's blamed Paradox.ai for the oversight, which was later acknowledged by the supplier. What it means The tens of millions of job seekers who trusted McDonald’s with sensitive information during the application process are now exposed to identity theft and other risks. Indirectly, the breach highlights the need for strong cybersecurity measures and strong governance over third-party platforms. System 🤖 Olivia 🔗 Developer: Paradox.ai Country: Global Sector: Travel/hospitality Purpose: Interact with job applicants Technology: Generative AI; Machine learning Issue: Accountability; Privacy; Security; Transparency

Date it happened
2025-06-01
Organisation involved
McDonald's
Product, system or model
Olivia
Where this came from
Share this incident
XLinkedInFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Attribution

This incident was imported from AIAAIC and is used under CC BY-SA 4.0. Our additions to it — the structured fields, the translation, the checks against other reports — are published under the same licence.

This is a record of what was reported, not a finding that anyone broke the law. If it names your organisation and you believe it is wrong, the corrections process is free and open to everyone.