Deloitte software glitches wrongly remove Texans from Medicaid
Advocacy groups filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission alleging that Deloitte's eligibility software, TIERS, used by Texas Medicaid, wrongly disenrolled qualified recipients due to glitches. Nearly 1.8 million Texans lost coverage after the pandemic pause ended, with many errors attributed to procedural issues but some linked to system malfunctions. Deloitte denies the claims, while the state says it restored care for at least 90,000 people. The FTC has not yet responded to the complaint.
- Company involved
- Texas Health and Human Services Commission
- AI system involved
- TIERS
6 source articles · read the reporting →
$3.75M HireVue Illinois BIPA class action settlement - Top Class Actions
Collected voice and facial biometrics from job applicants during video interviews without consent
- Company involved
- HireVue Inc.
- AI system involved
- HireVue
1 source article · read the reporting →
Black Job Seekers Seek Class Action Against Workday - BIN: Black Information Network
Workday's AI hiring tools screened and rejected job applications from Derek Mobley and other Black applicants, women, people over 40, and people with disabilities.
- Company involved
- Workday
- AI system involved
- Workday Recruiting
1 source article · read the reporting →
In-house counsel group accuses rival of training AI on its materials - Reuters
In-house counsel group accuses rival of training AI on its materials Reuters
1 source article · read the reporting →
ACLU Says in FTC Complaint That Aon’s AI Tools Discriminatory
The system screened out job applicants based on personality tests, video interviews, and cognitive assessments, affecting autistic, neurodivergent, and people of color.
- AI system involved
- ADEPT-15, gridChallenge
1 source article · read the reporting →
Intuit, HireVue Accused of AI Job Bias Against Deaf Woman
The ACLU filed complaints with state and federal agencies on behalf of a deaf, Indigenous employee of Intuit who was denied a promotion after an automated HireVue video interview. The tool did not caption all audible questions and could not accurately transcribe her speech, which the complaint says disadvantaged her because of her disability and race.
- Company involved
- Intuit
- AI system involved
- HireVue video interview
1 source article · read the reporting →
Job seeker asks First Circuit to revive class action over AI interviewing tool
Massachusetts financial consultant Mozart Saint Cyr leads a proposed class of job applicants who say JPMorgan Chase's use of HireVue one-way video interviews amounted to a lie detector test banned by state law. After a federal judge dismissed the case, they asked the First Circuit to revive it.
- Company involved
- JPMorgan Chase
- AI system involved
- HireVue one-way video interview
1 source article · read the reporting →
Workers Look To Lock In Sweeping Workday AI Bias Class - Law360
The system screened job applicants and rejected them, allegedly discriminating based on age and sex.
- AI system involved
- Workday AI tools
1 source article · read the reporting →
Workday Gains an Edge in AI Hiring Bias Fight: California Brief - Bloomberg Law News
Workday Gains an Edge in AI Hiring Bias Fight: California Brief - Bloomberg Law News
1 source article · read the reporting →
Fired Teacher Says AI Tainted Review And Arbitration - law360.com
The AI-generated performance evaluation contributed to the teacher's termination.
- Company involved
- Concord Public Schools
1 source article · read the reporting →
Resume prompt injection tricks AI hiring - moneywise.com
AI screening system determined which job applicants to advance to the next stage of recruitment.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Lawsuit claims discrimination by Workday’s hiring tech prevented people over 40 from getting hired | CNN Business
The system screened and ranked job applicants, leading to rejections for individuals over 40.
- Company involved
- Workday
- AI system involved
- HiredScore AI
1 source article · read the reporting →
Did IBM embed age discrimination in its AI-driven job screening software?
Daniel Swanson, a 24-year IBM manager in Austin, sued IBM in federal court, saying he was fired at 48 and then rejected for other roles because IBM's AI-driven HR screening software was programmed to favour younger workers. IBM denies the claims.
- Company involved
- IBM
- AI system involved
- HR screening software
1 source article · read the reporting →
US Federal Court Rejects Workday's Arguments, Allows AI Hiring Lawsuit to Proceed
米連邦地裁がWorkdayの主張を退け、AI採用訴訟の継続を認める - Межа. Новини України.
A federal court in San Francisco declined Workday's request to dismiss a lawsuit alleging its AI-powered hiring software discriminates against applicants with disabilities and other protected groups. Judge Rita Lin ruled that California anti-discrimination law may apply and allowed claims that the software screens candidates using proxy indicators such as employment gaps to move forward. Workday maintains its tools evaluate only qualifications and do not make hiring decisions.
- Company involved
- Workday
- AI system involved
- Workday
1 source article · read the reporting →
KPMG Australia partner fined over $10,000 for AI cheating on internal exams
More than two dozen KPMG Australia staff, including a partner, used artificial intelligence to cheat on internal exams since July. The partner will be fined more than $10,000 for using AI in a training course about AI. KPMG has upgraded its detection processes after previously tackling widespread cheating on internal tests between 2016 and 2020.
- Company involved
- KPMG Australia
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte report for N.L. healthcare contains likely AI-generated false citations
Newfoundland and Labrador's $1.6 million Health Human Resources Plan, authored by Deloitte, contains at least four citations to research papers that do not exist, likely generated by artificial intelligence. The errors were discovered after the report was published by the Department of Health and Community Services in May. Researchers named in the false citations confirmed their work was misattributed and the papers are nonexistent. The provincial government and Deloitte have not responded to questions about the report.
- Company involved
- Deloitte
- AI system involved
- Azure OpenAI
3 source articles · read the reporting →
SEC Charges Delphia and Global Predictions for False AI Claims
The SEC charged Delphia (USA) Inc. and Global Predictions Inc. for making false and misleading statements about their use of artificial intelligence. Delphia claimed from 2019 to 2023 that it used AI and machine learning to predict investments, while Global Predictions falsely claimed in 2023 to be the 'first regulated AI financial advisor'. Both firms settled the charges without admitting or denying the findings, agreeing to pay a total of $400,000 in civil penalties and to cease and desist from further violations.
- Company involved
- Delphia (USA) Inc. and Global Predictions Inc.
1 source article · read the reporting →
CFPB Acts Against Hello Digit for Faulty Savings Algorithm Causing Overdrafts
Hello Digit, a fintech company, used an automated savings algorithm that made transfers from consumers' checking accounts, falsely guaranteeing no overdrafts. The algorithm caused customers to incur overdraft fees, and the company often denied reimbursement requests. The CFPB found that Hello Digit engaged in deceptive practices and ordered the company to pay redress to harmed consumers and a $2.7 million fine.
- Company involved
- Hello Digit, LLC
- AI system involved
- Hello Digit app
1 source article · read the reporting →
McKinsey's Lilli AI Platform Hacked, Exposing 46 Million Chat Messages
Security researchers at CodeWall used an autonomous offensive agent to discover a SQL injection vulnerability in McKinsey's internal AI platform, Lilli. The vulnerability allowed unauthenticated access to the production database, exposing 46.5 million chat messages, 728,000 files, and 57,000 user accounts. The researchers responsibly disclosed the issue to McKinsey, who patched the endpoints within days. No data was exfiltrated or misused, and no disruption occurred.
- Company involved
- McKinsey & Company
- AI system involved
- Lilli
1 source article · read the reporting →
LLMjacking Attack Leverages Stolen Credentials to Exploit Cloud LLMs
The Sysdig Threat Research Team observed an attack where stolen cloud credentials were used to access cloud-hosted large language model services. The attackers targeted a vulnerable Laravel system to obtain credentials, then used them to invoke models like Anthropic Claude on AWS Bedrock. They intended to sell LLM access to other cybercriminals, potentially costing victims over $46,000 per day. The attack involved checking credentials against ten AI services and using a reverse proxy to manage access.
- AI system involved
- Claude (v2/v3) on AWS Bedrock
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Oracle faces US privacy class action over alleged surveillance of five billion people
Oracle is facing a class action lawsuit in California, alleging that its adtech and advertising subsidiaries collected vast amounts of data from internet users without consent, creating detailed profiles on approximately five billion people. The suit, filed by privacy advocates including Dr Johnny Ryan, claims Oracle's practices violate multiple federal and state laws. Oracle declined to comment on the litigation, which remains pending.
- Company involved
- Oracle
1 source article · read the reporting →
Estée Lauder settles with make-up artists sacked by algorithm
Three MAC make-up artists were dismissed after failing a video interview that was scored by HireVue's algorithm. They appealed but received no clear explanation of how the system assessed them. Estée Lauder Companies settled the resulting legal challenge out of court. HireVue later discontinued the visual analysis component of its video interview platform.
- Company involved
- Estée Lauder Companies
- AI system involved
- HireVue
2 source articles · read the reporting →
Sullivan & Cromwell apologises for AI hallucinations in court filing
Sullivan & Cromwell, an elite Wall Street law firm, used an AI tool to help draft a court filing in the Prince Group case. The filing contained inaccurate citations and misquoted the US bankruptcy code due to AI hallucinations. The errors were uncovered by opposing counsel Boies Schiller Flexner, and the firm apologised to the judge and filed a corrected version. The firm stated that its AI policies were not followed and its review process failed to catch the mistakes.
- Company involved
- Sullivan & Cromwell
3 source articles · read the reporting →
Deloitte to refund Australian government after AI-generated report errors
Deloitte used generative AI (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o) to help produce an independent assurance review for Australia's Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. The report, published in July 2025, contained multiple errors including non-existent academic references and a fabricated court case. After the errors were flagged, Deloitte acknowledged the AI use and agreed to refund the final instalment of the A$439,000 contract. The report was corrected, but its substance and recommendations remained unchanged.
- Company involved
- Deloitte
- AI system involved
- Azure OpenAI GPT-4o
5 source articles · read the reporting →
