The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

260 incidents closest to “Carpe Claims” · matched on meaning · public reporting

WF-GCB7V21 Jan 2026

OpenClaw vulnerabilities enable data leakage and prompt injection

In January 2026, researchers at Giskard exploited a deployment of OpenClaw, an open-source agentic AI. They found that architectural weaknesses in the Control UI and session management allowed prompt injection and unauthorized tool use, leading to potential data leakage across user sessions. The article outlines hardening steps to prevent such vulnerabilities.

AI system involved
OpenClaw

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-ZA0QQS1 Jan 2023

Hotel Guests Appeal Dismissal of Federal Price-Fixing Lawsuit Accusing Strip Casinos of Algorithmic Room Rate Collusion - Nevada Globe

Hotel guests allege that Las Vegas Strip casino operators used algorithmic pricing software that recommended inflated room rates, leading guests to pay supracompetitive prices. They are appealing the dismissal of their federal price-fixing suit.

Company involved
MGM Resorts International, Caesars Entertainment, Wynn Resorts, Treasure Island
AI system involved
Rainmaker Guestrev and Grouprev

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-S7REOZ18 May 2026

Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLC (W.D. Louisiana): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; CLE

Generated a legal brief with hallucinated case law, filed in court.

AI system involved
Claude

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-GYY2DP5 Sep 2025

CommNV vs Uprise (Nevada DC): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Penalty OR Order to volunteer and teach about AI…

The AI system generated fabricated legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court and opposing counsel.

Company involved
Christopher Day

1 source article · read the reporting →

Apple Siri Settlement: How to Claim Up to $95 - Yahoo Finance

Apple Siri Settlement: How to Claim Up to $95 Yahoo Finance

Company involved
Apple
AI system involved
Siri

1 source article · read the reporting →

New Meta smart glasses class action gives employers a reason to write the policy they've been puttin - hcamag.com

The smart glasses recorded bystanders without their consent and sent the footage to Meta for AI training.

Company involved
Meta Platforms
AI system involved
Meta AI-enabled Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-DY05NJ1 Oct 2022

Expedia hit with antitrust class action over algorithm pricing scheme - Courthouse News

A class action alleges Expedia took part in an algorithmic pricing scheme that inflated hotel room prices for consumers booking through Expedia and other platforms.

Company involved
Expedia

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-0ZQI8S4 Oct 2016

$30M Equifax hard inquiry dispute class action settlement - Top Class Actions

A class action, settled for $30 million, alleged that Equifax automatically rejected consumers' disputes of hard inquiries on their credit reports, sending a form letter instead of investigating.

Company involved
Equifax Information Services LLC

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-420M5R28 Jul 2026

Illinois appeals court fines lawyer $15,000 for fictitious citations in Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission

In Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, an Illinois Appellate Court case, a lawyer's filings contained fictitious legal citations and misquoted statutes. The court fined the lawyer $15,000 and referred the matter to the bar.

AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

Pearl Gardner v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (D. Arizona): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Bar Referral

Pro Se Litigant | D. Arizona | State(s): USA. AI tool: Clearpoint. Problem: Fabricated: Case Law. Consequence: Bar Referral.

1 source article · read the reporting →

Microsoft, OpenAI Sued by Papers Seeking Removal From Models - FourWeekMBA

Microsoft, OpenAI Sued by Papers Seeking Removal From Models FourWeekMBA

Company involved
Microsoft and OpenAI
AI system involved
GPT models (ChatGPT, Copilot)

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-3IBIIH10 Jul 2026

Del Biaggio v. Bansen (CA California (4d)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction

The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in an appellate brief, affecting the court and the client.

Company involved
Carlton Floyd

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-3U11XT14 Sep 2026

New York federal court sanctions lawyer for non-existent quotations after ChatGPT research

In Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck in the Southern District of New York, the court found that the plaintiff's lawyer filed briefs containing non-existent quotations and misrepresented authorities. In a filing to the court, the lawyer said ChatGPT had been used to assist with legal research. On September 14, 2026, the court imposed Rule 11 sanctions: $500 payable to the court and two New York continuing legal education credits in ethics on the use of AI.

2 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-9D8L0R21 Aug 2026

Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association (CA Florida (2d)): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs…

The AI generated false legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-QIPOTI21 May 2026

Jackie L. Miller v. Regions Bank (N.D. Alabama): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, DQ from case and court (6 months);…

Attorney H. Gregory Harp was sanctioned with a public reprimand, disqualification from the case, a six-month court suspension, and a bar referral for filing AI-hallucinated legal citations and deleting evidence.

Company involved
Regions Bank
AI system involved
ChatGPT

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-IM3YHH8 Sep 2026

State ex rel. Steven Schnell v. Honorable Rebecca Richardson (CA Missouri): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction

The AI-generated fictitious case citations misled the court and caused opposing counsel to incur attorney's fees.

Company involved
Jenna Rohr Conley

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-JJP7IB30 Mar 2026

Re an Office-Holder; Cork v Smith (Chancery): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Public admonishment; SRA Referral

The AI system generated a non-existent insolvency rule that was submitted to the court, misleading the court.

Company involved
Pinsent Masons LLP

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-AJ803M10 Jul 2026

Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections (11th Cir. CA): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Brief partly Struck; Adverse…

The AI generated a court filing containing non-existent legal cases, misleading the court and opposing counsel.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-88658811 Jun 2026

Sent. n. 1027/2026 (Corte Suprema di Cassazione): AI-hallucinated content in court filing, Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs Order

The AI system generated fake legal precedents that were included in a lawyer's court filing, misleading the court and opposing party.

1 source article · read the reporting →

WF-E84P7T1 Jan 2024

Consumer Reports calls for action against Meta over scam ad proliferation

Consumer Reports has called on the FTC and state attorneys general to take enforcement action against Meta for allowing billions of scam advertisements on its platforms. According to a Reuters investigation, Meta's own documents showed that the company delivered an estimated 15 billion scam ads per day in 2024, generating billions of dollars in revenue. Meta is accused of failing to identify and remove most scam ads, exposing users to fraudulent schemes and illegal products. Consumer Reports argues that Meta's practices constitute unfair business practices under the FTC Act and state laws.

Company involved
Meta

6 source articles · read the reporting →

Whitebridge AI faces complaint over false reputation reports

Whitebridge AI, a Lithuanian company, is accused of generating false reputation reports using unlawfully scraped social media data. The reports contained false warnings for 'sexual nudity' and 'dangerous political content'. Privacy group Noyb filed a complaint with the Lithuanian data protection authority, alleging violations of the GDPR. The complainants sought access to their data but received no response, and were later required to provide a qualified electronic signature to correct errors.

Company involved
Whitebridge AI

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-C3J9XA9 May 2022

Upstart Holdings sued for securities fraud over AI model claims

Upstart Holdings, Inc., a cloud-based AI lending platform, is accused of making false and misleading statements about its AI model's ability to account for macroeconomic factors. The lawsuit, filed on May 13, 2022, alleges that the company's positive statements about its business were materially false. Investors suffered losses when Upstart's stock price fell 56% on May 9, 2022, after the company reduced its fiscal 2022 guidance.

Company involved
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
AI system involved
Upstart AI lending platform

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-2HR7AX1 Jan 2014

Post Office Horizon scandal falsely accused subpostmasters of theft

The Post Office's Horizon IT system, supplied by Fujitsu, falsely reported financial shortfalls at many branches across England and Wales. Subpostmasters like Pete Murray were wrongly accused of theft and prosecuted, leading to loss of livelihood, reputational damage, and in some cases suicide. A group litigation, Bates v Post Office, settled, but many victims are still seeking compensation and justice. The scandal remains under investigation by the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry.

Company involved
Post Office
AI system involved
Horizon

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-EAN4XD1 Jul 2019

Clarifai sued for capturing OkCupid user photos without consent

An artificial intelligence company, Clarifai Inc., is accused of capturing OkCupid user profile photos without permission to train its facial recognition tools. The lawsuit, filed in Illinois state court in February 2020, alleges that Clarifai violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by creating a face database from the data. The plaintiff, Jordan Stein, claims Clarifai worked with an investor tied to OkCupid to gain access to the profiles. The case is pending.

Company involved
Clarifai Inc.
AI system involved
Clarifai facial recognition tools

10 source articles · read the reporting →

← Newerpage 10 of 11Older →