Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.
Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.
286 incidents closest to “CoCounsel Legal” · matched on meaning · public reporting
ChatGPT conversations were reviewed by third-party contractors without adequate disclosure to users.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The smart glasses recorded bystanders without their consent and sent the footage to Meta for AI training.
1 source article · read the reporting →
A class action, settled for $30 million, alleged that Equifax automatically rejected consumers' disputes of hard inquiries on their credit reports, sending a form letter instead of investigating.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system excluded a transgender woman from a women-only social networking app based on her facial appearance.
1 source article · read the reporting →
A generative AI tool drafted a temporary restraining order in Jackson Federation of Teachers v. Fitch containing fabricated parties, declarations, and statutory language, affecting the state of Mississippi and the plaintiffs.
1 source article · read the reporting →
ChatGPT's responses allegedly contributed to violent incidents involving minors.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Identified Christopher Gatlin as a suspect in an assault, leading to his arrest and 17 months in jail.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The Estate of Suzanne Adams has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, Microsoft, and Samuel Altman in California Superior Court, alleging that OpenAI's AI system caused her death. The complaint asserts claims for strict product liability, negligence, wrongful death, and violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. The case is pending.
7 source articles · read the reporting →
In Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, an Illinois Appellate Court case, a lawyer's filings contained fictitious legal citations and misquoted statutes. The court fined the lawyer $15,000 and referred the matter to the bar.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Pro Se Litigant | D. Arizona | State(s): USA. AI tool: Clearpoint. Problem: Fabricated: Case Law. Consequence: Bar Referral.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The system captured and stored license plate data and vehicle movements of Boulder residents and commuters, making it searchable by law enforcement without a warrant.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated fake legal citations that were included in an appellate brief, affecting the court and the client.
1 source article · read the reporting →
In Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck in the Southern District of New York, the court found that the plaintiff's lawyer filed briefs containing non-existent quotations and misrepresented authorities. In a filing to the court, the lawyer said ChatGPT had been used to assist with legal research. On September 14, 2026, the court imposed Rule 11 sanctions: $500 payable to the court and two New York continuing legal education credits in ethics on the use of AI.
2 source articles · read the reporting →
The AI generated false legal citations that were included in a court filing, misleading the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Attorney H. Gregory Harp was sanctioned with a public reprimand, disqualification from the case, a six-month court suspension, and a bar referral for filing AI-hallucinated legal citations and deleting evidence.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI-generated fictitious case citations misled the court and caused opposing counsel to incur attorney's fees.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI system generated a non-existent insolvency rule that was submitted to the court, misleading the court.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated non-existent court case citations that were presented to the High Court, misleading the judge and opposing counsel.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI generated a court filing containing non-existent legal cases, misleading the court and opposing counsel.
1 source article · read the reporting →
The AI system generated fake legal precedents that were included in a lawyer's court filing, misleading the court and opposing party.
1 source article · read the reporting →
AI-generated false legal citations were submitted to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, misleading the tribunal and the regulator.
1 source article · read the reporting →
Prakazrel 'Pras' Michel, a former member of the Fugees, was convicted of criminal conspiracy charges for attempting to influence US presidential administrations. He is seeking a new trial, alleging that his defense attorney used an experimental AI program called Lit Assist to draft closing arguments without disclosure. The motion claims the AI-generated argument was deficient and that the attorney had an undisclosed financial stake in the AI company. The court has scheduled an evidentiary hearing.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
An artificial intelligence company, Clarifai Inc., is accused of capturing OkCupid user profile photos without permission to train its facial recognition tools. The lawsuit, filed in Illinois state court in February 2020, alleges that Clarifai violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by creating a face database from the data. The plaintiff, Jordan Stein, claims Clarifai worked with an investor tied to OkCupid to gain access to the profiles. The case is pending.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
In 2016, Carmen Arroyo requested to move her disabled son Mikhail into a larger apartment in the same complex. The landlord, WinnResidential, used CoreLogic's CrimSafe tenant screening software, which flagged a dropped retail theft charge against Mikhail as disqualifying. The landlord rejected the application without explanation. Arroyo sued CoreLogic and WinnResidential under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Housing Act, alleging that the software disproportionately excludes people of colour. The case was scheduled for trial in August 2021.
10 source articles · read the reporting →
