The record

Where automated decisions went wrong

Incidents gathered from public reporting around the world. Each one links to the articles it came from. None of it is a finding that anyone broke the law.

Reports people file about their own experience are not shown here and never will be without their agreement. Tell us what happened to you.

Clear

68 incidents closest to “FRISS Compliance Screening” · matched on meaning · public reporting

Dutch police predictive policing project in Roermond faces discrimination allegations

Amnesty International's report alleges that the Dutch police's Sensing predictive policing project in Roermond uses algorithms that result in automated discrimination and mass surveillance. The system assesses crime risk for individuals and locations, potentially targeting marginalized communities. The report calls for accountability and human rights safeguards.

Company involved
Dutch police
AI system involved
Sensing project

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-HXS00H1 Jan 2020

Dutch government continued SyRI welfare fraud profiling after ban

The Dutch government deployed the SyRI algorithm to profile welfare recipients in low-income neighborhoods, despite a 2020 court ruling that the system violated EU human rights. The algorithm flagged thousands of parents for fraud based on illegal risk factors such as dual nationality, leading to false accusations, bankruptcy, and trauma. The government has announced an external review of the practices.

Company involved
Ministry of Social Affairs of the Netherlands
AI system involved
SyRI

10 source articles · read the reporting →

German Federal Constitutional Court restricts police automated data evaluation

The German Federal Constitutional Court ruled in a case brought by the Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (GFF) that automated data evaluation by police violates fundamental rights. The court restricted the practice, setting limits on police use of automated data analysis. The decision is a success for privacy and civil liberties.

Company involved
German police

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Titus Henderson files civil rights lawsuit against COMPAS

Titus Henderson, a prisoner, filed a civil rights lawsuit against COMPAS and other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin on July 16, 2018. The lawsuit alleges discrimination related to the use of the COMPAS risk assessment tool. The case is ongoing.

AI system involved
COMPAS

6 source articles · read the reporting →

Study finds Italian car insurers charge more based on birthplace

A study by the Universities of Padua, Udine and Carnegie Mellon found that Italian car insurers, including Genertel, Mps, Quixa and Con.Te, use birthplace and citizenship in pricing algorithms, charging some drivers over €1,000 more. The practice was ruled against in a 2018 decree involving Linear, but the study says it continues. The companies contacted denied or explained the findings.

Company involved
Genertel, Mps, Quixa, Con.Te

8 source articles · read the reporting →

Judge rules police search using Flock was mass surveillance

A judge ruled that a police search using Flock's automated license plate readers constituted a form of mass surveillance. The ruling concerns the deployment of the AI-based camera system by law enforcement, which the court found to be an invasive surveillance practice. No further details of the case were provided in the article.

AI system involved
Flock

4 source articles · read the reporting →

DeepScore markets facial and voice analysis app for trustworthiness scoring despite experts' doubts

DeepScore, a Tokyo-based company, is marketing an app that uses facial and voice recognition to score people's trustworthiness for lenders and insurers in Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines. The company says the app can detect deception with 70 per cent accuracy, but researchers and privacy advocates say there is no reliable scientific basis for such judgments and warn of discrimination and privacy harms. The chief executive said the system is only one part of lenders' and insurers' decision-making and that people can choose not to use it. Critics respond that an unequal balance of power makes consent difficult.

Company involved
DeepScore
AI system involved
DeepScore

6 source articles · read the reporting →

Wisconsin court used secret COMPAS algorithm to sentence Loomis to harsher term

In Loomis v. Wisconsin, a judge used a COMPAS risk score from Northpointe to sentence a defendant to a harsher punishment. The algorithm was kept secret as a trade secret, preventing the defendant from challenging its accuracy. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the sentence, ruling that the score was only one part of the rationale. The case raises concerns about due process and the use of secret algorithms in criminal sentencing.

Company involved
State of Wisconsin
AI system involved
COMPAS

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-DYTSSY24 May 2021

Lemonade backtracks on tweet claiming AI scans customer faces for fraud

Lemonade, an insurance firm, posted a tweet claiming it uses AI to detect non-verbal cues in customer videos to deny claims. After backlash comparing the practice to phrenology, the company deleted the tweet and denied using AI to deny claims based on facial characteristics. Lemonade stated it uses facial recognition only to flag claims submitted under different identities, which are then reviewed by human investigators.

Company involved
Lemonade

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-QSFASR1 Jan 2019

Denmark's Udbetaling Danmark welfare algorithm illegally surveilled millions

Udbetaling Danmark (UDK), Denmark's centralized welfare payment agency, used automated algorithms to check eligibility and detect fraud. The system collected personal data on millions of beneficiaries and their relatives, including non-beneficiaries, in what a think-tank called 'systematic surveillance'. A complaint to the Danish Data Protection Authority led to a ruling that the data collection violated GDPR, and UDK eventually deleted the illegally obtained data. The system also caused erroneous payments, including underpaying 300,000 pensioners by 94 million euros annually.

Company involved
Udbetaling Danmark

10 source articles · read the reporting →

EPIC lawsuit challenges USPS secret surveillance program using facial recognition

The United States Postal Service's law enforcement wing, the Postal Inspection Service, ran a secret surveillance program called the Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP) that used facial recognition from Clearview AI and social media monitoring tools to infiltrate online communities and monitor protests. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) sued the USPS for failing to conduct and publish a privacy impact assessment as required by the E-Government Act. A federal district court dismissed the lawsuit on standing grounds, ruling that EPIC did not suffer a cognizable injury from the agency's refusal to disclose information about the program.

Company involved
United States Postal Service
AI system involved
Internet Covert Operations Program (iCOP)

10 source articles · read the reporting →

Study finds credit score algorithms less accurate for minorities

A study of 50 million US consumers found that credit scoring algorithms used by mortgage lenders are less accurate for minority and low-income applicants due to sparse credit data, leading to higher rejection rates. The inaccuracy is due to noise in the data, not bias, so fairer algorithms cannot fix it. The study suggests that adjusting for bias had no effect, and that addressing the inaccuracy could reduce disparities by 50%.

Company involved
Mortgage lenders (unnamed)
AI system involved
Credit scoring algorithms

6 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-BSSRTA30 Apr 2019

Danish law enables algorithm to profile unemployed for long-term risk

The Danish parliament passed a law in April 2019 that allows an algorithm to analyse personal data of all unemployed individuals to identify those at risk of long-term unemployment. The system uses data on ethnicity, age, health, and education history to produce a risk score for social workers. Critics, including legal experts and unemployment insurance funds, argue the profiling is stigmatising, lacks transparency, and may violate GDPR. The Danish Data Protection Authority has reopened its review of the law.

Company involved
Danish Ministry of Employment

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-J5IU7Z3 Dec 2024

FTC settles with IntelliVision over deceptive facial recognition claims

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took action against IntelliVision Technologies Corp. for making false, misleading, or unsubstantiated claims about its AI-powered facial recognition software. The company allegedly claimed its software had one of the highest accuracy rates on the market and was free of gender or racial bias, without supporting evidence. The FTC also alleged that IntelliVision did not train its software on millions of faces as claimed, but on images of approximately 100,000 individuals. Under a proposed consent order, IntelliVision is prohibited from making such misrepresentations without competent and reliable testing.

Company involved
IntelliVision Technologies Corp.
AI system involved
IntelliVision facial recognition software

9 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-UHO4KG31 Aug 2021

Met Police buys £3m retrospective facial recognition system

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has awarded a £3 million, four-year contract to Northgate Public Services for a new retrospective facial-recognition (RFR) system to be deployed within three months. RFR processes biometric information from historic CCTV, social media, and other images to identify suspects and missing persons, operating retroactively unlike live facial recognition. The procurement was approved by the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime in August 2021. The MPS states that human-in-the-loop decision-making will be used, but digital rights groups and a former biometrics commissioner have raised concerns about potential discrimination, overrepresentation of marginalised groups in watch lists, and lack of a legislative framework.

Company involved
Metropolitan Police Service
AI system involved
Retrospective facial-recognition software

9 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-R2SNAZ1 Jan 2013

UnitedHealth used ALERT algorithm to limit mental health coverage, regulators found

ProPublica reports that UnitedHealth Group's Optum subsidiary used the ALERT algorithm to flag mental health patients and therapists as outliers, leading to therapy coverage denials. Regulators in California, Massachusetts and New York alleged this breached the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, and UnitedHealth agreed to restrict the system in those jurisdictions. The company denies wrongdoing and says its programmes are compliant. Affected patients, including Medicaid enrollees, were left to pay out-of-pocket or go without care.

Company involved
UnitedHealth Group
AI system involved
ALERT

5 source articles · read the reporting →

IRCC uses AI triage for Temporary Resident Visa applications

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) uses an AI system called Advanced Analytics to triage Temporary Resident Visa applications from India and China. The system categorizes applications into tiers, with Tier 1 approved automatically and others sent to human officers. Critics allege the system lacks transparency and may introduce bias, leading to visa refusals without clear rationale. The author, a Canadian immigration lawyer, is filing Federal Court cases on behalf of clients affected by refusals.

Company involved
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC)
AI system involved
Advanced Analytics Triage of Overseas Temporary Resident Visa Applications

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-88TTTL5 Apr 2018

Immigration NZ uses data model to predict likely troublemakers among overstayers

Immigration New Zealand has been piloting a data modelling system that uses demographic information such as age, gender, and ethnicity of overstayers to predict which individuals are likely to commit crime or incur hospital debts. The system then targets those individuals for accelerated deportation. Critics, including immigration lawyers and a lobby group, have likened the programme to 'Minority Report' and allege it amounts to racial profiling. Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway only learned of the programme on the day of the article and said he would seek a full briefing, but maintained it is not racial profiling and does not breach the Human Rights Act.

Company involved
Immigration New Zealand

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-LN1XAB1 Jan 2021

California EDD's automated fraud detection wrongly suspended 600,000 legitimate unemployment claims

In January 2021, the California Employment Development Department used Thompson Reuters automated batch review software to flag 1.1 million unemployment claims as potentially fraudulent. EDD stopped payments on those claims without prior notice. Later, over 600,000 were confirmed as legitimate after claimants used ID.me to verify their identity. The incident highlights the trade-off between fraud prevention and timely benefit access.

Company involved
California Employment Development Department (EDD)
AI system involved
Thompson Reuters Automated Batch Review

7 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-YDH39P1 Jan 2013

Swedish welfare agency's AI system flags marginalized groups for fraud investigations

Försäkringskassan, Sweden's Social Insurance Agency, uses an AI risk-scoring system to flag welfare applicants for fraud investigations. The system disproportionately targets women, individuals with foreign backgrounds, low-income earners, and those without university degrees, according to an investigation by Lighthouse Reports and Svenska Dagbladet. Amnesty International has called for the system to be discontinued, citing violations of the right to equality and non-discrimination.

Company involved
Försäkringskassan (Swedish Social Insurance Agency)

6 source articles · read the reporting →

Chicago class action challenges ShotSpotter's discriminatory stop-and-frisk deployments

ShotSpotter, a gunshot detection system used by the Chicago Police Department, generates alerts that lead to police deployments and stop-and-frisk stops. Analyses show over 90% of alerts are unfounded, and the system is deployed only in predominantly Black and Latinx districts. A class-action lawsuit against the City of Chicago alleges the system fuels unconstitutional and discriminatory policing, including false accusations against individuals like Michael Williams.

Company involved
City of Chicago
AI system involved
ShotSpotter

7 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-D2EVW81 Jan 2015

Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs used secret algorithm to score visa applicants based on nationality

The Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs used a secret algorithm called IOB to score short-stay visa applicants based on nationality, gender, and age. Applicants flagged as high risk were automatically moved to an intensive track with higher rejection rates and delays. The ministry's own data protection officer warned of potential ethnic discrimination, but the system continued to be used. The algorithm has profiled millions of applicants since 2015.

Company involved
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
AI system involved
IOB

10 source articles · read the reporting →

WF-0YQPL21 Jan 2019

iBorderCtrl lie detector falsely flagged honest reporter as liar

A journalist testing Europe's iBorderCtrl virtual policeman at the Serbian-Hungarian border gave honest answers but was deemed a liar by the system, scoring 48 out of 100 with four false answers flagged. The Hungarian policeman said the result suggested further checks, though none were carried out. The reporter only learned of the result after filing a data access request under European privacy laws. Experts and transparency activists have criticised the technology as pseudoscientific and potentially discriminatory.

Company involved
iBorderCtrl consortium
AI system involved
Silent Talker / iBorderCtrl virtual policeman

10 source articles · read the reporting →

CJEU rules Dun & Bradstreet must explain automated credit decisions under GDPR

A customer was refused a mobile phone contract because of an automated credit assessment by Dun & Bradstreet Austria. The customer took the case to court, which found that Dun & Bradstreet had infringed the GDPR by failing to provide meaningful information about the logic involved. The CJEU ruled that data controllers must explain automated decisions and that trade secrets cannot automatically override the right of access.

Company involved
Dun & Bradstreet Austria GmbH

7 source articles · read the reporting →

← Newerpage 2 of 3Older →